I can’t speak tp ADHD, but as someone with autism I can attest that while things work differently, there are both advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantages are best described as a mismatch between the ways that autistic brains work and the ways that we organize our society and educational systems.

My point is to say that we should make society more inclusive, which is the opposite of “let’s not do anything”. However, I am very much against pathologizing and trying to eliminate autism as RFKjr is doing.

Buy why would you want to?

Embrace neurodiversity. All Brains Are Beautiful.

The only way I’ll push back on this is that this is ALSO exactly how math works, as math is a language.

Math can only describe logically consistent systems that stem from a set of definitions and axioms. Those definitions and axioms can vary between fields.

You may know of a “graph” as a visual representation of a curve in euclidean space. Someone who works in a field that uses graph theory, such as a network engineer, knows of a “graph” as a collection of nodes and their connections.

Wildly different definitions of the same word for different contexts. Both lead to logically consistent mathematical systems.

Grok’s business model isn’t collecting your data.

It’s feeding you propaganda.

They are more interested in the other direction of data flow.

deleted by creator

Tech companies have more and don’t want IP getting in the way of AI.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

s/J/Horny J/

Needs to specify *with consent*.

deleted by creator

Thank you for sharing the other half of this equation <3.

Apparently the patriarchy leaves women allergic to empathy.

I haven’t read this one, but anything by bell hooks is a banger.

It’s not an iphone, but American-made smartphones exist. They just need a bit of investment.

Titans.

Titanians are from Uranus’s moon Titania.

Note: Titan and Titania are not to be confused with Neptune’s moon Triton.

Math is a language.

Sometimes the rules of the language let you know that you need another noun or verb to make a complete sentence.

Sometimes those using the language get so caught up in its formalism that they forget it’s supposed to represent reality.

I wouldn’t call it intellectual fraud. I would say that 120 years in, we’ve reached the end of what details following the math can fill in. As the article points out, it did correctly predict things like antimatter (yes, that’s what the article goes on to prove despite what the intro says). We need some new axiomatic postulates to shape our understanding of reality from which we can follow the math.

Planck quantized action and rotation. Einstein introduced a reference-independent speed of light. Dirac merged them. Einstein added the equivalence principle to relativity to describe gravity which has not been fully merged. If the math doesn’t work, don’t keep adding more. Try new foundational postulates.