Look. Maybe this will clear it up: I thought he was responding to Doomsider. He was responding to you. My mistake. You caught a stray. Why would I respond that way and then change my stance after the fact? No human, other than one making an error, would say that and try to correct it.

Yeah, probably.

Was meant for someone else. Stray shot.

You’re just asking why I think it would be good to harm people who have done nothing wrong. I wouldn’t. I can point to several posts in my history that will show I’m not a eugenicist. Which appears to be the brush you’re reaching for.

Don’t forget their cowardly base that will claim ignorance of the Paradox of Tolerance while they claim those who are intolerant of intolerance are just as bad and evil. Those who would step in front of the only solution found to work with any permanency. The fascist apologists and enablers.

Fascist uprisings are the closest we’ve come.

You’re free to make your own video without what you feel is an egregious oversight.

Since you’re not messaging me, anymore, I just want you to know that I think it’s really sweet of you to be able to care less for me. You’ve set our differences aside and become a better person than you were before. That’s what life is all about.

You’ve lost the narrative. Nobody cares what you think anymore, if they ever did. You enjoy the taste of boot leather with a sanctimonious superiority fetish. This is what you are.

So if a fascist is beating your face in, threatening to kill you and people are standing around, you won’t ask for help? But if someone does try to help you and must use violence to do so, you will tell them they’re the fascist? And this is good?

If a fascist is attacking and harming someone, you will stand by and do nothing, because this makes you good? You clearly don’t understand how your virtue signal of tolerance falls apart the moment you need help, or someone else needs your help. You’re not virtuous, you’re just a coward and an enabler.

You hide behind virtue to signal that you have developed a belief that doesn’t reflect reality. You’re also under the impression that you can talk them out of this. In fact, there’s a fable about people like you as a cautionary tale: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scorpion_and_the_Frog

Your inability to understand the Paradox of Tolerance, or grasp any real greater philosophy that doesn’t ‘feel the way you want it to’ makes you short sighted and ignorant. I hope you grow past this because you’re not only ineffectual, you’re trying to criticize those who are actually doing something. Until that changes you’re still a fascist apologist.

You would accept contracts with those who would break them, and then keep those contracts after they are broken. Not because you are virtuous, but because you have made a stupid choice.

You’re clearly trying to make someone build your arguments for you. If you’ve identified the problem, then please… let the rest of us know what that problem is.

Edit; oh wait, you want to rattle off how bad the history of the US is in order to sound the ‘let’s do nothing’ alarm in your defeatism, couched in cowardice.

So to be clear; if you don’t believe in using violence to stop violent fascism… then what do you believe will?

Edit; You’re falling victim to the paradox of tolerance. You’re advocating that we should tolerate intolerance lest we become the intolerant. This is where your ignorance on the subject shows. You’re not better than those who would use violence to protect, you’re an enabler of those who would use violence to destroy.

You’re a feckless coward and fascist apologist. Do you or do you not support using violence against violent fascists? Not me. You.

Man, sure is quiet here. He responded to me elsewhere, however… but not here. Fuckin’ crickets are loud, though.

I agree. That way I can continue my work against fascist apologists without interference from other fascist apologists.

Don’t block him. Any time you see him comment just let people know he’s a fascist apologist. The only evidence that you need is that he refuses to take a stand on whether he feels violence should be used against violent fascists. In fact, he doesn’t take any stand. That’s because he was never here to make a point in good faith. Help keep him and others like him out of here so that real people can have honest conversations.

My perspective is that you’re obfuscating from real solutions and distracting people with perceived problems. You have nothing of value to offer any debate or conversation. If we every want to know what’s wrong with the world, you’re an endless list. Ask you to take a stand on any given solution and you shut down. Why don’t you have any principles, Doomsider? Instead of telling people what we shouldn’t be doing… why don’t you let us all know what you think we should be doing?

Anyone that is unfortunate enough to stumble into this mess, please review all the conversations between Doomsider and myself. You will find he is either a bot, troll, or astroturfing. He refuses to take any stand on any matter and will only attack, deny, or accuse. He has no principles. Please ignore him and preferably, block him.

Answer the question. Don’t make it about me.