No. It’s ghosting if they reach out to you, and you ignore them.

This is not ghosting. Can’t speak on the rest. People are complicated, and their life seems more complicated than most from what little you said.

That’s kind of an absurd statement, isn’t it?

If you murder me by shooting me in the back of the head while I’m not looking, that’s not torture.

Obviously I still don’t want you to kill me, but… It’s still not torture, it’s a different thing, and we have different words for that… it’s murder, or killing, or slaughter.

Please keep in mind I’m not making a moral or ethical judgement, but a definitional one. Torture is a different thing.

If, as you say

there’s no way to avoid torturing an animal while taking their life when they don’t want to die.

How are you defining torture?

Did I torture my dearly beloved pets when they had cancer or infections bad enough that I had to have them put down? No! What an odd and cruel thing that would be for me to say!

But they still didn’t want to die, and I didn’t want them to either. That’s not torture.

Say no to AI slop

I’d try the egg pizza. Olives with the pits is a choking hazard, because people won’t necessarily be expecting it.

Last commit 2 years ago. :(

https://github.com/inclement/vivarium

Mice is animal

Mouses is computer/human interface device.

Niceguy

“Why aren’t girls interested in guys like me?! 😭”

Because you’re weird and overbearing.

I believe it’s a chameleon.

Am I having a stroke?

Can’t tell if an unreasonable entitled comment, or a sarcastic comment.

Maybe both? (눈_눈)

Poe’s Law, some people actually believe what you’re saying.

/s exists for a reason on the internet, where toneless text reigns supreme.

Atomic and declarative. Which is way cooler.

If we’re asking what people mean when they use those descriptors, then you’re correct.

However, literally speaking, in this context, immutable only means read-only, and atomic only means that updates are applied all-at-once or not at all (no weird in-between state if your update crashes halfway through).

The rest of the features (rollbacks, containerization, and immutable meaning full system image updates) are typically implied, but not explicitly part of the definition.

I’m only peripherally aware of the SCP community, but I really enjoy browsing the stories… what’s fallen apart about it?

I’ve noticed that almost everyone has missed the most “cloud-native” aspect of the Universal Blue project: The build process.

What’s really cool about this is that the images are built in a “cloud-native” way. Right now, they’re just using Github’s actions pipeline to push images. This does a couple of very cool things.

First: t means that any image that gets sent to your device was already built on a system and checked as OK. It’s still technically possible that a bad image could get pushed, but the likelihood is extremely low because they are tested as a single cohesive unit before being sent to anyone else’s device.

With traditional distros packages are built on a system and tested, but they’re not necessarily tested in a single common environment that is significantly similar between everyone’s device. This largely deals with dependency hell, and weirder configurations that cause hard-to-diagnose problems.

Second: It also simplifies the build process for the Universal Blue team because they are able to take the existing cloud native images from fedora and just apply some simple patches on top of that. While doing this in a traditional distro way as I understand it would be far more complicated. This is why Universal Blue was able to update their images to Fedora 41 like… 24 hours after release? It was crazy fast.

The creator of Universal Blue is also on the fediverse! I don’t know if this will actually ping them, but it’s worth a try.

@j0rge@lemmy.ml

@j0rge@kbin.social

https://github.com/bottlesdevs/Bottles/issues/2345#issuecomment-1733132198

To me it looks like the devs of Bottles said that they’d be patching Bottles to remove support links in non-flatpak versions.

So… isn’t what openSUSE did in the spirit of that? Obviously, them packaging it at all is against the devs’ wishes, but… I dunno, this whole thing is a mess.

I was just thinking about the Beau Brummel episode. He was almost an actually good guy too. One of the least bastardly people to be covered.

Maybe like a 2.

I’m gonna be honest, when I read this, I initially thought it was a joke answer by a community menber. The joke being about vague hand-wavy statements that people make when dodging questions.

Then I realized it’s OP, and OP is ostensibly the actual developer. I have nothing specific to say about this situation, especially from a technical perspective, but this reply… why even bother?