Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
The ultimate question of philosophy…
“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus
It’s like if 4chan and Quora had a baby.
Do you mean Jewish arabs? or Semitic Muslims maybe. Technically Semitic is a language group which includes arabic but like indo-european it can also refer to the people who originally used the dialect… bigotry fails at logic.
Lemmy is all about making strawman arguments!
Prosecuting scientists for publishing unheard of ideas in a manner that hasn’t been sanctioned by an established scholarly/religious institutions…
The solution to bad science is science.
Why are timeshares so bad? Never looked into it but the concept seems to make sense on the surface.
We have to work out what intelligence is before we can develop AI. Sentient AI? Forget about it!
Straight up description of an entity thousands report seeing while on DMT tho.
So can looking at screens. And temperature. And eating spicy food. And…
That’s… not relevant to my point at all.
Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.