• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone want to argue why porn video games are a benefit for society, or even a single persons health?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not about porn games. It’s about allowing third-party private interests to engage in censorship.

      If Valve were to ban porn games from being sold on Steam because they find them distasteful, I wouldn’t have a problem with this. But it wasn’t Valve’s decision. It was the payment processors who did it on behalf of interests that are apparently allowed to determine what is permissible on other people’s platforms.

      That’s not okay.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        So this is basically the same as the argument that drugs shouldnt be illegal? Is this just purely based on freedom?

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I couldn’t care less… I care about what will be the next thing someone unaffected by me consuming it, would ban it and deprive me of it

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would say they aren’t as bad as alcohol and gambling, which are pervasive…some of them are just…art…some aren’t :D I could ask you the same about lots of other things, from music to literature. I just don’t like book burning. If someone put their effort into creating something that they thought was worth creating, why is it up to anyone to ban it for any adult?

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No, but you might want to take a step back from that ledge advice a steep much huddy hill.

      Frankly I think a lot of modern games are fucked up in their portrayal of the human body, and those relationship sim dress up games are kinda gross.

      But I don’t think this should be too to credit card companies to unilaterally decide.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its more perverted to want to control what other people are jacking to than it is to jack it to porn games. Keep your perversions to yourselves weirdos.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is the exact thing I’ve always thought about homophobes. It’s pretty gay to get obsessed about what other men do with their dicks.

  • omniman@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    fucking fuck fuck fuckers , if they wanted to ban then they should have contacted to steme why payment providers bruh

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Pro life feminist”

    A christian conservative group in drag,nothing to see here.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. They drive all the decent people out of anti porn feminist spaces, like the porn is misogyny subreddit. They need to be stopped.

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    That is so dumb. How would such a small group have that much pull? It seems like gooners would vastly outnumber them.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sick of religious sex freaks forcing others to adhere to their puritan fetishes

    We need to ban organized religion

      • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        A tolerant society can not tolerate intolerance. One side will attempt to “just live”, but the intolerant side is incapable of “letting live”, and they will not stop until they replace tolerance with their system of hate.

      • MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but since orgaanised religions can’t help to force others to live by their standards, they need to get out of the way. I’m fine with people needing a comfort measure, even if its in the form of an invisibile friend. Whatever helps people sleep at night. However, when they try to force their ideals down everybody elses throat thats a big no.

        So, since they can’t ‘live and let live’ they need to go the way of the dodo, fuck off, and leave the rest of society alone.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Meh, I consider religions as political movements. When they go crazy fundamentalist and become destructive, sure, shut them down.

          But not just based on their future potential to turn destructive, that can happen to any ideology if the conditions are right.

          • Barrymore@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            But what undeniable good thing comes from religion? It’s not just that they have the potential for destruction and hate, it’s that those are the only possible outcomes

              • Barrymore@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                We could get unions, consumer protections, housing and food and other necessities guaranteed. We don’t, but we could. Politics is just trying to solidify how things are run. Obviously easily can be used for abuse, but can be used for good. Religion from the first step is to tell you how bad of a person you are and how to resolve it: join a cult, deny personal responsibility for anything and put that on whatever deity or subject for hate at the time, all your answers should be sought through your religion and not outside sources

                • Gsus4@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  You’re making a lot of value judgements without a whole lot of evidence to back them up. My point is perfect atheist: religious movements are a type of politics with certain aims (not exactly unions, but incidentally communion, charity, etc). It is you who are saying that religion is somehow a special phenomenon who puts them above regular ways to organize society…for the worse. Maybe you think that it is because it is irrational and metaphysical. There is plenty of metaphysics in the form of utopias (heaven) in politics, saints/prophets (cult of personality). You just say that bad comes out of religion, but not out of politics…yeah…ok.

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        i was wondering the same thing oh my god.
        ik you can be any religion or anything but the main problem i have with atheism is they make fun of religion.
        like atleast be respectful if your gonna be atheist not have a superiority complex.
        edit: maybe i used superiority complex here loselessly

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Atheism has never been used as the justification for a genocide - can any major religion claim the same? It’s obviously an extreme example, but at the same time it’s not entirely unreasonable to feel superior when comparisons like that are so easy to make.

          • Mwa@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            wdym “Religion causes Genocide” do you mean Zionism,because i never heard of A religion that has been used as justification for genocide (except for Zionism,Including atheism)

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        The majority of the secular world are atheists. Don’t pretend like it is some small subsection just because you live in a bubble of whatever religion you were born into.

        • stepan@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Agnostics. Not necessarily atheists. And they sure as hell aren’t sam harris type dickheads about it like this lemmy thread has.

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Agnostic sounds like a sub-category of atheism like it is with different beliefs under theism. Ie. It’s Theism vs Atheism, and then everything below the two. If you don’t believe or don’t know if you should believe, then you’re not really a theist, making it atheist.

        • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Bro I don’t believe in God either. To be honest sometimes I wish I did.

          Regardles my problem isn’t with atheism but with specifcally Reddit Atheism

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ew, when did we get reddit’s cringy appeals to the audience talking past the original poster in an ineffectual attempt to throw shade?

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    OK now I am not one to lob accusations without evidence, but for any of you kind government agents or AIs reading this, let’s say from anywhere within the Five Eyes since we’re talking about Australia:

    We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos. You know how this has trended in the past. Keep an eye on these people.

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Really goes to show people. It doesn’t matter the religion. They all are bullshit machines for people to act superior than others. Fuck these twat waffles.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Later I need to make a meme where the soldier takes the hits for the child, the child being Visa/Mastercard

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The same group who complained Detroit Become Human is bad for glorifying child abuse and women abuse. Yet supported Cuties…

  • CMonster@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Honestly, my steam algorithm started showing me alot of that garbage out of nowhere about a year ago and I had to keep telling it to stop. Like to each their own but some of that shit was pretty gross. I’m not complaining it’s gone.

    • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Groups like this never say “Mission Accomplished” and go home, they will escalate until you are sent to jail for playing Mortal Kombat or GTA

    • cosmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      There’s a toggle for the store that hides porn games. They’re not visible unless you yourself actively click on it saying you want to see them. The default is to keep them hidden. The feed also adapts to what you click on. If you see garbage it’s on you.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I truly don’t understand how Visa/MasterCard/etc can be pressured. They are basically infrastructure.

    What’s someone going to do, stop using credit cards if they don’t stop a store that person even patronize from selling morally hazardous goods?

    I don’t get how these campaigns are even effective.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing is they are American corporations who care to much about their public image. I would be highly suprised if they national payment platforms would also accept this. (ideal/bankcontant/wero/etc)

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Probably just worried Trump will over regulate them if they don’t fall in line with the Christian Radicals.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not when exchanges still govern taking money out. They are businesses like everything else and will be just as risk averse

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          One benefit to payment processing for crypto is that there’s little in the way of material limitations on processing payments. The blockchain for a given coin already exists, your job as a processor is primarily to convert those on-chain transactions into and out of other currencies. Only requiring intervention at the point of entering or exiting dollars to and from the system changes a lot of the dynamics.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s pretty easy to switch between cryptocurrencies, so they can surely find an exchange that is friendly to their business. That’s way better than the credit card situation where there are only four major processors–Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express–and only two of those actually matter.

      • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s because 90% of cryptocurrency marketing consists of “THINK OF THE GAAAAAAINS YOU CAN MAKE!” instead of “You can use this to buy things without government censorship”.

        The entire crypto industry has based itself around being a speculative asset, not a currency.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which is really unfortunate. If you avoid the most popular coins (Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc), you avoid most of the scams and speculation and end up with a decent currency that respects your privacy and has low fees.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Monero is perhaps the best option imo. Here’s the official page about it, but basically:

              • not profitable to mine, so most miners are enthusiasts who want the coin to succeed
              • privacy-focused - basically creates a ton of fake transactions to mislead snoopers
              • relatively popular - seems to be the most popular coin recommended by privacy enthusiasts (e.g. Mental Outlaw, he even gives a discount on his store for Monero)
              • not popular among speculators - they mostly stick to the big ones (BTC and ETH), as well as new startup coins
              • low cost transactions, fairly short transaction window

              It’s far from ubiquitous, but it’s popular enough that if a place accepts any crypto, there’s a good chance they accept Monero as well.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Some do, which is a lot more than GNU Taler. I don’t know of another digital payment system that has more usage that isn’t dominated by a handful of companies.

                  Here are some examples of things you can buy today w/ Monero:

                  It’s far from ubiquitous, but it is being accepted today. If any of those places interest you, I recommend putting a small amount of money into Monero and trying it out.

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      They pressure payment processors through reputation damage and regulatory threats - these companies are terrified of being associated with anything that could trigger banking regulations or get them labeled as “enabling” problematic content in the media, its purely a risk management desicion for them.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Supposedly there was a ruling in California that made them responsible.