• tedd_deireadh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Exactly!

      “So, sorry <insert Super PAC here> we’d love to help you astroturf the EU elections, but those pesky laws are stopping us.”

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Exactly this. This messaging is for their customers, e.g. those that buy political ads, and their investors, those that want line go up regardless of how. They aren’t speaking to their users. Their users are part of the product they sell.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      “No one”

      They don’t give a shit what their users want. Their users are part of the product they sell. Their customers are their advertisers. This is bad news for political advertisers and their investors, both of whom absolutely want political advertising on the platform. This is a good thing. It would be a much better thing if people would just stop using Meta products altogether

    • Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The government parties do. That’s who they’re targeting with this ‘news’.

      Any government party seen bending to the metatwats can fuck off too. But unfortunately they really want the exposure to show the kids how hip they are.

        • Babalugats@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Not all of them, but that’s what meta is trying to get at. “Your laws stop us from marketing you u to the masses”

          Fuck 'em. I hope I live to watch meta crumble to shit and everything like it.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    A fantastic example of why regulation can be good and is often necessary. You can‘t leave tech corporations or even most corporations on their own accord. They need a short leash or they‘re going to tear humanity apart.

  • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Oh shit, really?

    That’s really a pity that luckily for me I’m no longer giving an absolute metric fuck about meta and any of its shit content or its servi…spywares since 10 years at least already, and also I haven’t the slightest idea of changing my plans in that regard.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    meta: we’re stopping political ads because of the evil eu pls write them and complain

    literally everyone: another benefit to being in the eu <3

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    They probably think this will persuade the politicians to review these rules, as they can’t reach their target audiences anymore. I hope they see the overwhelming support for this decision, but I’m not sure if I’m in a bubble. I only see positive reactions so far. There was 1 critical article in the news, but just stating facts, no opinions. I think it’s great. Less brainwashing going on during the election cycles from now on since Facebook in particular allowed for some really specific demographic targeting.

    • Mia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Aren’t these ads too? Someone as paid for this propaganda so it is technically ads right?

      • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Like reedit they look the other way because fake accounts generate lots of engagement. They could easily shut down such accounts and they choose not to.