• ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Alternative title:

    U.K. makes Google remove search results going to illegal prescription drug website

    is a comment that attempts to resolve the people in power of any wrongdoing over the situation

    and no, you can’t consider the two events in complete isolation from one another because they’re both targeting the same end goal

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What are you talking about?

      I am trying to focus the attention on the most effective target, namely the reason why Google was requested to take action in the first place.

      Focus your energy on the reason as to why the drugs are prescrption and deal with that problem, once that is done the website issues will solve itself.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is the most effective target not to just find another place to buy it illegally? Certainly more realistic that to have any affect in politics.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That depends on the outcome you want, if you want to legalize it, then it is less effective than protesting and informing the public about it.

          If you just want to get it for yourself then you are right.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I used to think LGBT legal issues were just a case of speading information, but my hope in conversation is rock bottom.

            This appears to be a harmful action that can be more easily attributed to malice rather than protection. I expect some protests will contain violence in return.