A cell phone video showing a white Jacksonville, Florida, police officer striking a Black man in the face during a February traffic stop before he’s dragged from his car has gone viral, sparked outrage and led to conflicting accounts of the incident from civil rights lawyers and law enforcement.

William McNeil Jr.’s lawyers Ben Crump and Harry Daniels say the video, which McNeil took from inside his car, is a clear depiction of brutality, coming as law enforcement officials – from masked ICE agents to local police officers – have been scrutinized for their use of force, particularly against people of color.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    The body cam video has now been released, and shows the cop ordering him out of the car 7 times, warning he’d break the window, and so he did. The dashcam video make it looks like the cop just did that without warning.

    The guy still shouldn’t have been punched, and there may be other issues, but the idea that the guy was perfectly innocent in his behavior is not strictly true.

    • Booboofinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Maybe he was not totally innocent, maybe the may even had a valid reason for breaking his window, since he said it would not roll down. However punching him in the face, dragging him out and the violence that followed was completely unjustified and unnecessary.

      Cops should be accountable for what they do. They ore meant to enforce the law and are not above it

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      He refused to provide his license during a traffic stop which is certainly an arrestable offense. However, it kind of sounds like the stop might have been illegal in the first place. They pulled him over for not having his headlights on. During the day. In clear weather. They also say they pulled him over for not wearing his seat-belt, but I don’t see how they could have possibly known that until they had already pulled him over. So you start to see how this looks more like profiling/harassment than a legit traffic stop.

      If the traffic stop is illegal, then you are well within your rights to refuse to cooperate.

      • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If the traffic stop is illegal, then you are well within your rights to refuse to cooperate.

        Don’t know if that’s the case in australia. It is in the USA I believe, but for other countries? Not sure

        The wrongs of the police far outweighs the ones of the victim

      • Trapped In America@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They also say they pulled him over for not wearing his seat-belt, but I don’t see how they could have possibly known that until they had already pulled him over.

        This has been a thing forever here. It’s common(-ish) knowledge to leave your seatbealt on until the cop approaches you. Otherwise they’re allowed to assume that you also weren’t wearing it before the stop and write you a ticket. It’s dumb.

        Which sucks for guys, since we usually carry our wallets in our back pocket. So our first instinct is to take off the belt, take out our wallet and have everything ready for the cop when they walk up. Which is a $100 mistake you only make once (hopefully).

        • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          And that totally makes sense. If you’ve been pulled over for, say, speeding, and the officer notices that you aren’t wearing your seat-belt then that should get added. But it seems like that would be really easy for the officer to make a mistake or simply lie about as a primary offense. I did look it up and Florida has a primary enforcement law for seat-belts, which means technically they can pull you over for not wearing it without any other reason for the traffic stop. So that sucks. I mean, I want people to wear seat-belts, but that just seems like a statute ripe for abuse.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You are correct, the police officer on scene is supposed to determine the innocence of the people that they are giving the pre-arrest brutalizing to.