• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The perception of noise is quite complicated. But as a rule of thumb: when some noise changes by -10dB, then you hear it about “half as loud”.

    Source: I have a university degree in acoustics.

    So for the reduction of -12dB here, it will be perceived as “nearly half as loud”. Very different than the “94%” is suggesting.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      We agree that the -12dB is what’s important for human hearing … Now, you may agree that the 94% reduction is what counts regarding engineering // fabrication // design.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        We agree that the -12dB is what’s important for human hearing … Now, you may agree that the 94% reduction is what counts regarding engineering // fabrication // design.

        -2db* and 37%*

        Why are you perpetuating the wrong information?

        • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The snippet quoted in the original comments and referenced in subsequent comments refers specifically to the decibel reduction of the frequencies being targeted by the invention, not the volume of the overall sound.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Is it? Because the next sentence in the paragraph (and the only sentence missing in the quote) is the overall sound reduction. Which is far more important and far less misleading than saying 12db and 94% quieter.

            Its intentionally misleading to deceive people, and than the general public incorrectly defends it, this is you.