Seriosly, why?

      • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        The thing is that you normally don’t release details of pending investigation, but trump and Republicans were riding on this promise and now that they actually have the power they looking for excuses “files don’t exist”, “files were created by Democrats”, “why you even talk about files?”

        It is clear that trump doesn’t care about integrity of the investigation (given that people involved in it were fired I think effectively it is stopped) but that he is in those files.

      • tisktisk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        But if one asks a better question that more accurately presents what another is looking for, it’s certainly better guidance than an answer to a nonsensical question, yeah? I know what they say about those who answer questions with questions, but I’m conventionally opposed to such ‘wisdom’

  • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Legal Eagle just released a video about “the real Epstein files”. The main point they covered in the video is victim impact. The victims could be threatened and harassed because of the info.

    Another point not covered is that criminal case info is typically not disclosed. Releasing a list of accused perpetrators (i.e. pedophiles/child rapists) encourages vigilante justice. It also interferes with any ongoing investigations, which should (at least in theory) still be ongoing.

    I don’t want Trump to release the case info. I want his DOJ to announce charges against people like Les Wexner, based on that info. And I want it to not just be his political enemies and bullshit lies.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I very much get the first point. Victims need to be protected at all costs. Even if it means the public doesn’t get to know things.

      To the second point, the way Trump handled it felt very much like “case closed, nothing to see here”. This does not feel like justice is going to be served.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Dig into the bus crash more. It was minor, but Giuffre then checked herself into the hospital and made pretty bizarre claims about her health. Then she went home and killed herself shortly after.

        There was nothing nefarious about the crash, and it revealed she was having mental health issues.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Did they cover the part about how Biden’s DOJ had absolutely no fucking excuse to take that long to prosecute?

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        We can’t seem like we are making it political because he’s running for office or some bullshit was always the excuse.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Yet they waited 3.5 years until right after he won the Republican nomination to bother charging him and that was just for the Jan 6th bullshit let alone the Epstein stuff.

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            He should have been tossed in jail by February for insurrection. The whole hand wringing about ‘appearances’ excuse is why we can’t hold anyone in power accountable.

            • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              Yeah the sycophants are always quick to make up a million excuses why Democrats can’t ever accomplish anything they talk about, while simultaneously pretending they’re “fighting fascism” by supporting this farce.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        There probably just isn’t the kind of direct evidence people imagine. You can’t prosecute people just for associating with a creep.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I specifically mentioned Les Wexner for a reason. While the public information includes an absolute ton of red flags, and it’s very likely that he bought child prostitutes, it doesn’t reach the level proof beyond a reasonable doubt. IOW, it’s unlikely to reach a conviction in court.

          These people are also rich enough to drag out a court case for decades, even longer than the government. As such, they aren’t likely to take a plea agreement that’s more than a slap on the wrist and without admitting anything serious.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Okay, fine. Then if there was never going to be a prosecution, then there was no impediment to the Biden admin releasing the files.

          So, which is it: did the Biden administration fuck up by slow-walking the prosecution, or did the Biden administration fuck up by failing to release the files even when it had no intention of prosecuting? Those are the only options!

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    too much powerful people on the list: Hollywood moguls/execs, World leaders(people like belerscuni, eventhough hes been caught already), DEM/GOP mega donors, plus the politicians themselves. RFK jr too, since theres a photo out there him interacting with epstein in 1994

  • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Too many influential and very rich on there most likely. Among all the Republicans probably also a few democrats because we know there are quite a few assholes among those too.

  • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Because you don’t publish details of investigation. You publish indictments once investigation is done. That’s essentially weaponization of DOJ.

    Republicans were promising to release (and suggesting Democrats are on it). Now as they have the power, they refuse. Claim the files don’t exist then that they are fake, then they are boring.

    At this point it is very clear that trump is in them.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago
    1. Donors - some donors are implicated - eg Bill Gates
    2. Bill Clinton - Bill Clinton is a known associate, former president
    3. Celebrities/Press - Steven Pinker and a lot of the other idiots that dems like to pretend are smart and exceptional are implicated.
    4. if Dems released it it would probably be easier for trump etc to dismiss allegations as a smear
    5. Dems did prosecute Maxwell but its not clear anyone else can be charged.

    Its clearly stupid to not have released a list of epstein’s friends and been like “these people are wanted for questioning”

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I think one reason is that democrats wanted to do things by the book, and they didn’t want to be accused of tampering with the 2024 election, more than trump already did.

    • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Reminder, when you don’t do things by the book, the perp wins in court on technicalities or wins on appeal. For example, see Harvey Weinstein.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    The give reason must be procedual, but the real reason is that the Epstein files undoubtedly also contain the names of democrats or democratic backers. They were more than happy doing nothing with those files.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      So, no hiring hackers to actually change votes to Biden/Harris votes, but anything short of that? I dunno, if that were their standard they would have released the Epstein stuff. My real guess is that some Democratic politicians are also on the list. Even if it’s only a couple, they might have figured running against a convicted felon gave them such good odds there was no need to throw any of their own under the bus. And apparently none of them said, “Well but what if he hires hackers to change votes to Trump votes?”

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Musk and Eaton had the means to change votes, not sure what your first statement is about.

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’m convinced that Trump won because his team changed Harris votes to Trump votes, plain and simple. The differences between their totals were statistically anomalous compared to all the downballot candidates, the variations were just below thresholds that would have triggered automatic recounts, and these anomalies were present in the 7 swing states only. Those facts alone should justify formal audits, which I hope will happen. But it all kind of depends on the fate of the one lawsuit filed so far.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yup.

      Clintons were very good friends with Biden but also trump.

      Neoliberals poisoned the party so much that during Epstein’s hey day the letter by a name didn’t matter, trump himself was a big donor to the Dem party back then.

      Neither Biden or trump could release just the names of people they don’t like, because they’d snitch on the people they liked and then you’re on the hook for protecting the ones you liked.

      Someone like AOC is the only shot at a president that would actually release it. We need more politicians who have a loyalty to voters over a party.

      Party leadership changes, and we got a rare window right now the party won’t block someone like AOC. We can’t count on that being true in 2032 if she doesn’t feel ready in 2028.

      Ready or not, it’s time.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Someone like AOC is the only shot at a president that would actually release it.

        You act like Bernie doesn’t exist. I’m 100% confident that he’s not assosiated with that hot mess in any way.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            C’mon now. Old elderly white men who could die any minute is what this country has exclusively elected since 2016.

            If anything he has a better chance than AOC at being president, simply for having white hair, wrinkles, and a penis.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      …or they’re friends with child rapists, or owe favors to child rapists. Those three are the only answers that make sense.

      • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        That is the more likely true explanation. All of these rich and powerful people know each other, owe favors to each other, have dirt on each other etc. That makes them less likely to put anyone in their circle in danger.

    • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Note how normal people have no issue saying that Democrats may be (or likely are) in the Epstein files, but MAGAs are like “The files are a hoax but if they exist he is not in them but if he’s in them it’s just a juvenile mistake, who cares”

    • itisileclerk@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      That’s my thinking, US citizens are prisoners of the immorality of the richest regardless of their political contributions. Trump has masterfully exploited this with the “devide and empire” maxime.