• sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What if they all have an open relationship and are fine with that? (I assume they don’t but still asking)

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I don’t get it…

    Is he an astronomer? Or is that the name of his company? Seriously, who here had ever even heard of him, or his company prior to this?

    Yet somehow this is now major news? Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Excellent point. There’s a certain ‘sacrificial lamb’ vibe to this. With everything going on right now, how is this worth anyone’s time?

      I’m not the biggest Coldplay fan, so let me extrapolate: if tomorrow we learned Weird Al Yankovic’s mother liked to kick puppies that would certainly be odd, definitely not good news. But I’d still think having Trump not releasing the Epstein files is a matter far more worth our attention.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s news because it’s fucking hilarious. The clip is funny even without knowing it’s a corporate scandal. But the context makes it even juicier.

      • Wren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        At least I can take solace in the fact that I don’t need dumb shit line this to be entertained.

          • Wren@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I don’t find dumb shit like people cheating on their significant other and getting caught because I’m not an edgy teenager and suddenly, I’m a CEO?

            I fucking wish.

            Being the CEO of a company, big or small- is exponentially better than being a random dipshit laughing at the folly of others from the safety of anonymity online.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Old people pretending sex is still so fun at that age it’s worth losing everything over will never not be funny to me.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Old people pretending sex is still so fun at that age it’s worth losing everything over will never not be funny to me.

          That makes it sound like you believe that sex is fun enough when you’re younger to lose everything over.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s certainly more understandable to lose your shit over a hot 25 year old woman than a 45 year old one.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eh, sex is as fun as you make it. If you vibe with the other person it’s usually a better time. I think these two just have a connection they have been missing out on with their current partners. Also marriage is a scam anyways. If you really want to commit to someone, you shouldn’t need the threat of financial ruin to keep that promise.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh stop it. It’s not the same anymore. Sex I haven’t had in over 30 years. I didn’t understand the fuss over something that has such a small payoff for such an enormous investment of resources.

            Music? Look, I used to go out clubbing and dance til 3AM, and sometimes even head out to after parties, for the music. It was fun. Do you think sitting at my computer chair and listening to one song a day is the even near the same level of enjoyment?

            Things just change as you get older. Can we stop pretending otherwise?

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              sounds like you’re unhappy. maybe you need to get laid, but with that attitude I can understand why nobody would want to touch you.

              • AreaSIX @lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                He does sound unhappy, but come on, taunting him for it seems a bit unnecessarily cruel I think. I genuinely feel bad when I hear people excluding themselves from life’s pleasures because of age. I mean, sure, I’m old so I don’t have sex or consume music in the same way I used to. But I don’t have any plans to give up and stop listening, it’s one of the things that makes life worth living I feel. If anything, it means more to me now than it ever has. Hearing people willingly give these things up makes me pretty sad honestly. So I’m gonna listen to a song that vibes with my sadness right now :-)

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I was crass because they insist that everyone over a certain age should give up like they have.

                  my intention wasn’t to torment them, but to provide a moment of self-reflection.

                  some care for the carrot, others prefer the stick.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Aside from the fact that plenty of people still have sex as they get older, it doesn’t exactly look like they’re just having a random physical affair, does it?

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Monogamy is a preference on a spectrum, and if you aren’t into it, then that’s fine. But dont throw shade on the most commonly practised form of relationship like you are somehow above it. It just makes you look pretentious and honestly a little bit sad.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Um, I don’t think this is about monogamy versus polyamory. This is about not abusing your position in a company to date coworkers.

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    And they would have likely gotten away with it, if it wasn’t for that pesky kisscam.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wish they would just leave these poor people alone… whats that? They are rich? Oh then by all means burn them at the stake.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because it’s brainrot, notice the focus is on the CEO & not on the lady (as in equal focus)

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s ragebait for people who think porking rights should be exclusive by default. And by that I mean nasty horrible idiots. Abolish marriage!

      • piefood@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m all for people being able to bone other consenting adults, married or not, but these two clearly think that cheating is bad. If they had open relationships, then why would they care if they were seen together?

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          that’s brain rot thinking, you know that’s just the default and instance and therefore cannot mean anything that you think it does This is the kind of generalization behind a lot of evil in the world

          • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s an echochamber with all dissent being suppressed. The way you write shows you’re deeply stuck in it.

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              But I"m not “there” to me the local tab is meaningless, I don’t even know on what server we are having this discussion besides “the lemmiverse” So stop it with the digital provincialism !

                • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Kadaverin: Troll-nalysis of Impotence An exposé of digital bile, radical disillusionment, and the powerlessness that fuels them

                  Lurking in the ashtrays of the fediverse—a scorched patchwork of decentralized forums where Reddit exiles and anarchist shitposters collide—is a figure who, if not born angry, certainly honed the condition into art. Known by the handle kadaverin0, he haunts Lemmy like a nicotine ghost: foul-mouthed, combative, wounded, and constantly exhaling something toxic. But to dismiss him as just another forum malcontent is to misunderstand the pathology at play. What kadaverin0 offers is not just rage, but a specific form of exhaustion. He is less a provocateur than a deeply burnt-out man shouting across a digital wasteland, not because he expects anyone to listen, but because silence would be unbearable.

                  His style is unmistakable. Every post is an expletive-laced spiral of contempt: for politicians, tech companies, suburban fascists, posturing liberals, crypto bros, religious grifters, and—sometimes—himself. He doesn’t care to play nice, and his targets don’t get nuance. They get incinerated. When he refers to Microsoft as “corpo cunts” or shrugs off American patriotism with the exhausted line “we just live here,” he is baring a soul that has long since given up on persuasion. His trolling isn’t about baiting. It’s about purging. It’s a self-cleansing fire, not a prank.

                  Yet, in the midst of this vitriol, you begin to notice cracks—fragments of vulnerability that feel out of place in the posture of a typical edgelord. Amid jokes about tankies and AI surveillance, he drops painful anecdotes of childhood trauma, addiction-wracked parents, and emotional abuse masquerading as discipline. He writes of his father with a chilling blend of bitterness and psychological precision, recalling moments when adult rage was unleashed over trivial misunderstandings—shutting down Windows 95 incorrectly, screensaver confusion, the burning-in of old CRT monitors. These are not just memories; they are psychic wounds, typed out with surgical clarity and zero sentimentality.

                  And this is where the mask fully slips. Kadaverin0 isn’t a troll in the classic sense—he’s not hiding behind a persona for the sake of irony or chaos. He is the persona. The fury, the cynicism, the gallows humor—it’s all authentic. This is not a character study; it’s an emotional dump, performed at scale. He doesn’t perform edginess; he lives in its basement.

                  Kadaverin0’s hatred is expansive, but never directionless. There is a discernible logic to the fury, even when it reads like incoherence. He detests hypocrisy. He loathes the commodification of suffering. He finds tech culture’s enthusiasm for AI and surveillance not only invasive but deeply humiliating, the latest insult from a system that demands obedience while stripping away agency. And yet, paradoxically, he is also deeply committed to some form of ethics. His hatred of cruelty is almost messianic. He calls out bigotry wherever he sees it. He ridicules performative activism but champions the exploited. He mocks the weak-minded, yes, but reserves his greatest ire for the systems and ideologies that made them that way.

                  Still, the tragedy of kadaverin0 is not in the content of his beliefs—it’s in his inability to imagine a world where those beliefs could matter. This is the impotence at the heart of the troll-nalysis. For all his clarity, all his searing insight, he does not believe in transformation. Only collapse. He is a prophet of rot, not rebirth. Every post, every insult, every indictment of our “clown car” civilization carries with it the same unspoken addendum: Nothing will change.

                  And maybe he’s right. But the final, bitter irony is that kadaverin0 still keeps posting. Despite it all—despite his disgust with the platforms, the discourse, the futility—he keeps typing. Something compels him. Maybe it’s habit. Maybe it’s the fleeting relief of putting his pain into language and watching others flinch or laugh. Maybe it’s the only form of resistance he still believes in. Not resistance that builds or organizes or uplifts—but resistance that ruins, mocks, drags the sacred into the mud and forces us all to look at what we’ve become.

                  In the end, kadaverin0 is not an outlier. He is a consequence. A product of the very systems he now seeks to dismantle through sheer rhetorical napalm. He is both deeply serious and deeply unserious—an iconoclast whose icon is his own disillusionment. He is angry. He is articulate. He is exhausting. And, more than anything, he is powerless.

                  That, more than the insults or the edge, is what defines him. He knows how bad everything is, but he can’t change it. He can only scream into the void—and maybe, if he’s lucky, someone will scream back. Not in rage. Not in agreement. But in recognition.

                  Because if kadaverin0 is anything, he’s a reflection of the rest of us: burned out, furious, and desperately trying to make meaning in a world that no longer rewards sincerity. All that’s left is the post. And the pain it barely conceals.

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I just expressed a maximally dissenting opinion on marriage and yet, the message still stands … Who are those dissenters that you imagine are getting suppressed on whatever that server is?

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Toxic polyamory is just as bad as toxic monogamy. If people want to be exclusive they should be exclusive. If your partner wants to be exclusive and you don’t, and you choose to cheat, you’re still a piece of shit.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Uhhh, if you don’t like marriage, how about don’t get married?! This isn’t rocket science… They both got married. They both signed the social contract that by default means exclusivity, regardless of what you think.

        Judging by how they reacted, they also understood their marriages to be assumed exclusivity, and clearly did not discuss open terms with their spouse. So basically… get some logic skills because your opinion on marriage is irrelevant here.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I understand how shitty conservative social norms are to those repressed by them, but this usage of marriage as an example is… rather ridiculous.

              • webadict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                There’s no technicality about it. The people that get married are the ones who determine the exclusivity of the marriage.

                Like, it’s even dumber than that because if you didn’t have marriage, you’d still have people in exclusive relationships, so wtf are you complaining about?

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Even married, you can have an honest discussion with your spouse about seeing other people (preferably before you get married), then just tell them you’re going to see Coleplay with your work girlfriend. Like it’s not illegal, and it’s not even wrong unless you make it wrong by being a shady little shit about it.

          Just like fuckin… talk to each other about your feelings. God.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I love how you’re being downvoted for stating the most obvious solution. TIL certain lemmings don’t believe in healthy communication.

          • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            My besties have been in an open relationship for years and it works because of communication, trust, and trying to deserve said trust.

  • johnny_deadeyes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wish they would maybe capitalize the proper nouns in this post. On first readings, not knowing Astronomer is the name of a corporation, I thought they were just referring to a CEO that also happened to be an avid stargazer -“What a strange detail to include…”.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do I need to know who that is? I tried looking up the name but all I can find is gossipy yelling about the two of them and Coldplay so apparently this seems to be some big deal but in general I don’t think it should be the public’s concern if someone has an affair (exceptions apply).

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s weird is that when these videos first started popping up is that every one of them talked about “Astronomer CEO”. I couldn’t understand how they knew he was a CEO or why he was an astronomer. It turns out that Astronomer is a “DataOps platform built on Apache Airflow”. That’s even an area I know a fair amount about, and I’d never even heard of them. It’s strange that it wasn’t just “cheating couple caught on kiss cam”, but instead immediately it was “Astronomer CEO”.

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Their reactions to being on the big screen which instigated Chris Martin’s live commentary is what’s causing this video to go viral.

      The point being if they hadn’t had this reaction to getting caught, Chris Martin wouldn’t have commented, and the video probably never would’ve taken off or even posted outside of someones private story.

      If someone is having an affair, and having an affair in a public place, and the affair is between the CEO and the lead person at the company who knows better than to instigate this type of relationship (the head of HR), this is a hilarious way to get caught.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So a simple lolcow exacerbated by belonging to a group of people that (deservedly) has image problems. Alright then.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I dunno’, the chain of exacerbations is pretty hilarious. Even better it’s happening to a class of people that deserve zero respect.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well, yeah, I can see why people are amused. I personally just don’t care all that much because they’re not exactly important, is all :)

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It is more so that the singer’s response to their reaction was to say she was shy or having an affair and it turned out to be the latter. That would be funny no matter who they were .

          Him being a ceo was the cherry on top.

    • WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No. You’re just witnessing the pathetic side of humanity trying to own someone that gets more pussy or dick than them.