• Denjin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Waterworld. At the time the most expensive movie ever made and the most spectacular flop of all time.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        John Carter suffered from an awful title.

        “Princess of Mars,” would have resonated better with marketing. And is actually one of the book titles.

      • Babalugats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I must be on my own. I know John Carter flopped phenomenally, but I really liked it. Thought it was a great movie. Was very annoyed when I found out that there may never be a 2nd. Even if there was, at this stage it is very unlikely to be the same cast. IIRC, a lot of the blame was on Disney marketing. But IDK about these things.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Don’t worry brother, I still go back and watch waterworld. I like oceanscapes and post apocalyptic settings. Esthetic can be enough for me.

      • Denjin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I did some digging and apparently Waterworld somehow broke even. I remember a lot of the hype around the film at the time was wanting to see if it was really as bad as people said it was.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Neither of those movies were really all that terrible. I enjoyed John Carter. But clearly they didn’t connect with audiences.