• ilmagico@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Google Maps, their traffic data has no rivals, unlike gmail which has plenty of good competition. It’s the one thing I couldn’t easily replace yet.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I switched away from google maps to Apple Maps a few years ago and I honestly can’t tell any difference. If google maps traffic data is better, it’s not in any noticeable kind of way for regular day to day usage.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly Apple Maps is better in my area by a decent margin. It’s up to date sooner and that matters in a rapidly growing city. Google still beats it in search but even then AM finds things it doesn’t at times. i just wish they’d move on from shitty Yelp. I vastly prefer AMs navigation over GM as well.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      their traffic data has no rivals

      do you mean the waze traffic data, or does google actually have some of its own?

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        or does google actually have some of its own

        every phone running Google’s version of Android with location enabled.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          And just like their ridiculous chat apps, they have no beneficial feature integration or consolidation between the two.

          Google Maps has the ability to report speed traps and hazards, but none of that data comes from Waze or vice-versa.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I prefer OSM since I can use the maps offline. Google maps is useless out in the middle of nowhere without any cell service.

      • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not to discourage usage of OSM at all, but you can absolutely download offline maps on mobile with Google Maps, they’ve just hidden it a bit. If you tap your account icon in the upper right, a menu pops up that includes offline maps, and it’ll let you select boundaries to download.

      • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which makes it good for hiking, and I’ve found it’s better for bike routes too. However, I can’t easily search for places to go, there’s no recommendations, and generally you need to know the address of the place you’re going to (not just a restaurant/bar etc.).

      • tim-clark@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I tried OSM and it completely failed. Downloaded the offline region, loaded it up at home fine. Went to the location and the offline map wouldn’t load. Had a connection and tried to load an online map, nothing. Ended up right back using Google maps. I support the concept of OSM, it just doesn’t work.

          • tim-clark@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, I used solely on my phone. It worked fine at home and looked promising. When I went out 2 days later it wouldn’t load anything, was on cell only with excellent 5g data. Tried for about an hour and it just wouldn’t load a map.

            • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              But what app did you use to access OSM and download the maps for offline use… was it a web browser? OsmAnd? Vespucci?

            • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Uh, but…OsmAnd is a phone app. So you’re saying you used the website on your phone’s browser, then? I’m not sure if that has an offline function, though I never used it myself. Does it say it has that function? Otherwise I think you will have to install an app, first.

              Maybe you downloaded the offline map files, but had nothing to open them with. Apps use their own versions of the map files, by the way, those files you download from the website are for other use-cases.

              • tim-clark@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Osmand+ paid for it and it didn’t work when I left my house. Useless product that doesn’t do it basic functions. And no I’m not going to QA it for them.

                • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Shame, it’s worked perfectly for me for many years. No idea what went wrong with you, of course, and it doesn’t sound like you’re up for troubleshooting. Oh well, hope you have a better time with Google or Apple stuff!

      • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Far from any desire to give kudos to Google: Maps does allow offline maps.I had greater London available on my iphone recently, and that worked.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      True. I wanted to replace it with OSM or similar, but my main use of Maps after navigation is exploring places, reading reviews, and browsing pictures. They have a database that is tough to replace.