• eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      didn’t phrase that well, what I meant was when I have a conversation on lemmy I don’t want to respond to a beehaw post that less than half the lemmy population can see.

      • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I had fully understood what you wanted to mean, even though phrased badly. However the reason I quoted it is because of how contradictory is your thought process.

    • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, you are missing something;

      not just half the population, and they’ve defederated from the largest instances.

      I don’t know, sounds reasonable chief.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I don’t know, sounds reasonable chief.

        They want to talk to everyone so they’re blocking someone/anyone? That does not sound logical. If that instance defederates, all that person has to do is just not use them as their home instance. They’re saying they want to talk to everyone, but they’re going out of their way to not do so (by blocking an instance, for whatever reason). Makes no sense to me.

        • eee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          didn’t phrase that well, what I meant was when I have a conversation on lemmy I don’t want to respond to a beehaw post that less than half the lemmy population can see.