• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Actually, he’s announced increasing the existing tariffs against Chinese Steel and Aluminium. He didn’t even talk about EVs at all.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are we really going to do this today?

        From the article at the top of the page.

        According to The Wall Street Journal, the Biden administration will announce plans to roughly quadruple tariffs, to 100 percent from the current 25 percent, as well as tack on an additional 2.5 percent duty.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Correct. Tariff’s on Aluminium and Steel. More importantly, WSJ cite the video of Biden giving a speech about steel and aluminium.

          Imagine this as a headline:

          Breaking News: President Biden Announces War on Chinese Soda.

          That is an equally true title.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Do you have a phone in your pocket?

      If you do then congratulations. All of the data your car would collect is already out there for sale to the CCP.

      If you’re talking about people who have high level sensitive conversations in cars, then yes. But that’s an incredibly small group and they have those conversations in government vehicles that are all made in the US.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Then he should solve the issue by requiring the code to be hosted on American servers with source code inspection.

      Not put a gazillion dollar tarifs on them.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Then he should solve the issue by requiring the code to be hosted on American servers with source code inspection.

      Not by making EVs unaffordable.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        “source code inspection.”

        Great idea. That way it can be put on pause indefinatly because that shit takes years.

        On top of it. You can NEVER be certain anyway because there’s code burnt into the chips that you cannot read.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Then make it so the manufacturer cannot just push cloud updates without permission from an oversight committee.

          Raising the price does nothing at all to fix the security issues.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s just not the same to review code that runs a slot machine.

            And code that runs a whole car.

            One of the two is a whole lot more complex and probably had millions of lines more than the other.

            I’ll let you guys which is which

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Novel idea: make a car, not a cloud service. My phone is better at navigation etc anyways.

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes a big risk. Both natsec and IP theft are major concerns and cars are fully mic’d and compromisable.

  • Hawanja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Chinese EVs are piece of shit death-traps anyway that tend to explode for no reason.

  • Gennadios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Translation: Biden doesn’t want fire hazards that take hours and hundreds of gallons to extinguish imported from china.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Anti China Republicans are going to HATE this! They would MUCH rather Elect the man whose Daughter got over 70 patents FASTTRACKED in China once he was elected!

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They would just put their hands on their ears and repeat “Hunter Biden laptop” until a scary fact like that one goes away.

  • ghostblackout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do t want the Chinese EVs because there falling apart exploding crushing more exploding and.there just not safe

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But Elong Musk’s shiny acute angle isn’t? You’re a fucking idiot.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m interested in seeing the statistics for this, as I’m looking at a new ev and it would be nice to see.

      Because you wouldn’t just make something up would you, you must have the figures to substantiate your claim.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Anecdotally cheap Chinese EVs are all over Costa Rica and even there they’re generally known to be garbage. Like how do you get a fairly car rusty in Costa Rica? Even if you live exclusively on the beach you’d have to have some really bad paint and 0 rust prevention done.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Which EV brands? Those Chinese EVs aren’t created equal, the good ones are great for its price, while the bad one should be named and shamed.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Contrary to teslas that don’t explode and don’t rust. BYD is dominating with affordable EVs while other countries keep prices astronomically high.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    they really willing to throw the planet under the bus so they can protect their own oligarchs. so much for the free market.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Protectionism only works in the VERY short term. If the USA doesn’t pull its finger out of its ass and make affordable good EVs, then its automotive industry will crash and burn. Because the rest of the world unaffected by tariffs will be buying Chinese (or Korean / European) EVs and not American ones because they’ll be expensive and suck.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am genuinely curious if CCP subsidizing cheap steel and aluminium on the global market can be sustained and for how long. If they control output then they’ve probably got the land resources and authority to keep it up for decades, right? Somebody should do a study on this.

  • ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    With how china keeps implanting everything with spyware, I agree to keep them away from the heavy tech incorporated cars. Really wish we could transition away from using chinese shit

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      All auto manufacturers put spyware in their cars now. This isn’t a china problem, this is an everyone problem. We need anti-spyware laws that apply to everyone.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Tariff is actually against Steel and Aluminium heavily subsidized by the CCP and flooding the market. At no point in Biden’s speech did he talk about EVs or electronics.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh? More spyware than GM selling your data to your insurance company? More spyware than all of the stuff your smartphone collects?

      It’s absolutely a bad faith argument to say we can’t have Chinese cars because they conduct industry standard data scraping.

      • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The whataboutism doesn’t help. It’s a wrong practice regardless of nationality. But since the house and senate is bought by the corporations, at the very least ban those who you can.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s not a whataboutism when that’s the other choice. This isn’t out of left field. I can buy Chinese data scraping, Japanese data scraping, Korean data scraping, German data scraping, or American data scraping.

          Right now Germany actually wins that contest because GDPR just might have an impact.

          A whataboutism would be me talking about American labor practices in farming. Not great, but also not relevant.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I agree. If this were actually addressing the problem in question (bad faith actors harvesting data) then sure, but it isn’t really because the other options are still suffering from the same problem. If anything, this entire discussion is a whataboutism to avoid talking about how more electric cars lets us phase out the ice ones.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I wasn’t going to go there because projection is, unfortunately, very effective at making the other party look immature when they correctly call you on it. But yes the entire discussion of data harvesting is a whataboutism. It’s not relevant unless someone stops doing it.

  • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The US doesn’t control the supply chains. Biden subsidizes EVs as well. US labor is too expensive and the resale value of EVs are very poor. If there is a country that can make EVs cheap enough, it is China. The EU and US stand no chance. Even with safety standards and 27% tariffs, Chinese cars are still cheaper, and the quality is good. US currency is artificially too high. US traded in their manufacturing for financialization. This is a case where Joe Biden can’t beat the global market, with the rest of the world buying China. American EVs are a flop.

            • sushibowl@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s not so much about where it goes, more so the fact that it doesn’t stay in America. This is about saving the American auto industry. Whether it’s for the jobs that would be lost or the profits of the shareholders.

              • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s a bingo.

                The idea that “they” don’t want the American public driving EVs is ridiculous.

                • bamboo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You misunderstand. This is protectionism plain and simple. US car companies are horribly inefficient. Better yet, the US car cartel eliminated most of their budget models to push trucks and SUVs that are more expensive. It doesn’t take much to undercut them, so the US government is banning the competition.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                The military will just order a million new pickup trucks as light utility vehicles.

                And the Answer to jobs isn’t more punishment.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            So what about Tesla, Kia, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, and all the rest? You say we can’t afford cars yet 15 million new cars are sold every year here. New cars have never been something that just anyone can buy which is why the used market is so much larger.

            Selling Chinese EVs here below cost isn’t going to improve anything. It’s just going to put a bunch of competitors out of business and drive wages even further down.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              If you want everyone to switch to EVs you need some that are cost competitive with gas vehicles.

            • AProfessional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              The cost of cars has not scaled with incomes. EVs are also much cheaper to manufacture yet because of lack of competition they only sell luxury cars. Nissan admittedly tried but I think that was just too early to market with a mediocre product.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                The added price is likely partially due to the development costs for these companies retooling their factories and doing R&D to develop these new platforms in a company that has been building ICE vehicles for the past 50-100 years. Luxury vehicles bring a markup that helps to offset these costs until these vehicles become more ubiquitous, parts are easier to source, and prices come down. You can’t compare the cost of a brand new design to something like the Camry which had the general design ironed out 40+ years ago.

                If you look at sales numbers, the Model 3 is outselling the cheap alternatives like the Leaf and Bolt 20:1, so it seems like many people are willingly choosing to pay more rather than buy the econobox option. The average sale price for a (any) new vehicle is around $50k currently, and there are a multitude of options in that price range.

                • AProfessional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  This is all true. I just genuinely believe more EVs to market would be good for the consumer over the coming years.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The tariffs are for Steel and Aluminium, intentionally shifting the discussion to EVs is disingenuous, just like the article.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This makes the most sense. Sell them here. Built elsewhere? Tax the shit out of them. You can avoid the tax by creating American jobs and having them manufactured here.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s what the chicken tax is/was. This is just a tax on EVs made by Chinese companies. It’s pretty ridiculous.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes, why not? They aren’t prohibited, they’re just being given a disadvantage compared to American made vehicles being sold in America. A tax for notoriously poor labor standards, we can call it. If they want to use a union shop somewhere in middle America they can avoid that tax altogether.

            If I misunderstood you please correct me.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s literally in the textbooks as the kind of thing you’re not supposed to do. If you keep protecting US companies they will never get better. Prices will never come down.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The free market is propaganda to trick people into thinking capitalism is somehow ethically solvent.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Might be a valid argument if China didn’t play currency games.

      Also, the protectionist in me wants American heavy industry to continue to exist.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Imagine believing that China is the only country playing “currency games”.

        It’s all just imaginary numbers based on printed paper.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I want American heavy industry to be good enough to continue to exist. Otherwise we’re just a house of cards waiting for a stiff wind.

      • lenz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ironically, cars are stopping me. Roads used to be for walking, and now they’re for cars. They gave us sidewalks and now some places don’t have them, and are unwalkable. The bike lanes either don’t exist or are too dangerous to use. It’s all roads and stroads now, with speed limits dangerous to pedestrians, and large SUVs meaning that car crashes with a pedestrian are more likely to end in death.

        The amount of people in cars has also crippled public transportation. Buses aren’t quick, and there are so few of them in general. Not to mention the lack of high speed trains, and the inefficiency of our subways.

        Giant parking lots with no cars took our parks. Took our public spaces. Took our nature. And they’re everywhere. Everywhere I look is dull, grey asphalt.

        It’s depressing to be outside. And where would I walk to? Everything is too far away to walk to. It used to be a 5-15 minute walk away. Now it’s more like 40 minutes to hours…

        I’m tired of human interests and public transportation being overlooked so that people can drive a couple minutes faster to their destination. When people in Europe, Japan, and China can just… get on a train.

        Sorry for the rant but I hate this bs

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I literally do that to go to work and university. I walk to my local train station 20 minutes and it’s amazing that I can. It makes me wake up, even as someone who hates to get up early and gives me time to listen to music, podcasts or think about personal stuff.

        That being said, it’s not true that no one is stopping me. All those idiots that park in the sidewalk are stopping me. All those idiots that endanger me with their crappy super heavy metal boxes are stopping me. I literally have to stop when I want to cross the road.

        And besides that, walking is only possible if you don’t live in a car infested hellscape (luckily I do for the most part). Otherwise, the next destination is hours away by walking, rendering it pointless, and walking becomes very dangerous.

      • claudiop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        They partially solve the fuel and the bad air problems. In exchange they damage roads way more (I recall reading that the damage is proportional to the vehicle weight to the fourth power, probably with some more nuance) and that also creates substantially more rubber micro particle pollution. They also happen to be more dangerous in the event of a crash. Plus the additional challenges with grid load, which some people dismiss with silly ideas like having said cars act like load balancers (that would be a mess to scale).

        In most cases, EVs are not a solution to mobility, they are a solution to save the car industry from real solutions to climate change, namely spamming trams, trains and buses (in sparse locations) all over the place.

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        EVs are a step in the right direction.

        However, EVs only change one aspect of cars: How they go vroom vroom.

        They are still heavy metal boxes operated by random people. Most drivers suck (myself included probably), they are lazy and don’t follow the local law on driving.

        They are absurdly dangerous, for people inside other cars, themselves, and pedestrian. Anytime someone goes too early with their car it’s potentially an accident with death causes. Same if they spin their funny wheel a little too much.

        Imagine yourself overtaking a car on the highway. Now let’s say the driver slips by accident, wheel stairs to your sidey giant death machine crashes yours from the side, and its a horrible accident.

        Besides that, car infrastructure is absurdly expensive, and becomes even more expensive Everytime it needs to be renewed. The city I was at school at is literally one of the poorest in my country after having endless money in the 70s, because they built too many roads. They built some roads not on the ground but in large pillars, and it’s literally falling apart.

        Lastly, cars take up tons of public space. Cities designed (or rather bulldozed for) cars sprawl, need huge parking lots, huge streets, produce noise pollution, regular pollution.

        There is much more but that should suffice for now.

        That being said, I doubt we can ever go truly car free. Remote regions do not have enough people for good public transit to be maintainable, and the distances are often too long for walking or biking. Deliveries need some kind of individual vehicle. Some of that can be addressed with EVs and car sharing.

        Sadly, EVs are being presented as the all around solution.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Then China shouldn’t subsidize its manufacturers’ exports while increasing the burden for foreign companies to compete internally. If anyone thinks China cornering the global EV market is a good long term plan, they are naive.

    • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      China charges nearly double for its EVs outside of there Chinese market. They tend to do what most companies do, charge the highest price that people will still pay. China domestically is the most competitive market in the world, so they have $10,000 high quality EVs, but they don’t have to do that elsewhere and so they don’t.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t see how they’re going to pass the safety regulations here and in the EU. A ton of their ICE vehicles never made it here because they’re dangerously designed and built.

      • kalleboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The Volvo EX30 is based on a Geely platform, made in China, and does well in the EU (won several Car of the Year awards).

        MG (SAIC/Roewe) also has no trouble selling in the EU.

        Chinese manufacturers can make regulatory-conforming cars when the market demands it of them. If the market wants cheap and doesn’t demand safety, they can do that too.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s not %100, the EX30 is still engineered and developed in Switzerland and pretty much everything MG wise, was and still, is developed in the UK…yes both are owned by Chinese companies, but it doesn’t mean the products are solely Chinese. You are correct they can build cars that are designed to conform to western markets with much stricter regulations, but I don’t think they’re going to do so without significant input from branches in these countries.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Then the cheap EV’s doesn’t matter if they are not legal.

          And the Volvo was not based on Geely. It was the other way around. They bought Volvo for this purpose exactly.

          But I hope they will make better EV’s for the world. EV’s are generally just better cars, and it’s a clear road to less noise and toxic pollution.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But I really wanted to die driving the suda sa01 ev which boasts features such as; zero crash ratings standards, and no air bags.