It doesn’t take much to be accused of supporting terrorism these days. And that doesn’t just go for student activists. In recent months, dozens of lawmakers and public officials have, without evidence, insinuated that U.S. news outlets provide material support for Hamas. Some even issued thinly veiled threats to prosecute news organizations over those bogus allegations.
Their letters were political stunts. Prosecutors would never have been able to carry their burden of proof under anti-terrorism laws, and all the pandering politicians who signed the letters knew that. But next time might be different, especially if nonprofit news outlets, such as The Intercept, manage to offend the government.
There’s no reason to believe the press is exempt from overreach. In their recent letters, elected officials called for terrorism investigations of the New York Times, Reuters, CNN, and the Associated Press, relying on allegations that those outlets bought photographs from Palestinian freelancers who covered Hamas’s October 7 attacks.
Wait, what about the ones that actually support domestic terrorists? What about the ones that are run by actual nazis?
Those are all troubled lone wolves. Just a LOT of troubled lone wolves supporting one another, communicating over Discord, and working together towards a common cause
If a Nazi supports israel is he still Anti Semitic?
Checkmate Hitler.
yes, if he thinks of Israel as a place for jews that want to live in his country to be deported to.
See also : Rishi sunak, Rwanda.
Weird name for a city tbh
Actually snorted lmao