• wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      “While initially gleeful at the imminent damage to his competitor’s brand, Kool-Aid Man would soon be confronted with the irony inherent in his own vast advantage in consumer mind-share.”

    • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’d think Jim Jones would’ve been able to afford the good stuff, but I guess cult leaders don’t make as much as I would’ve thought.

      • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is an example of it going poorly but advertisers to an extent do it on purpose. Kool-aid gets used to refer to powdered drink mixes like band-aid is used to refer to adhesive bandages and, in some regions, coke is used to refer to soda in general. The idea is to become so associated with the concept as to overshadow the competition.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          At the same time, lawyers also fight the phenomenon because if your product name becomes the concept itself it loses all trademark enforcement. There’s a chart posted on this site somewhere that shows words losing trademark status because of court rulings, but I guess I didn’t save it. The term is “genericized trademark”.