I love how you dodged more than half of the issues, knowing you didn’t have jack shit.
Hence your substantive engagement on what I did mention?
you love mamdani
Never claimed this.
If they’re all the same
Never claimed this.
You should hate him too, right?
None of this is about hate, it’s about which policy decisions are better than others.
So I guess they’re not all the same and Democrats are, objectively better, is that right?
Again, never claimed.
Everything you’re saying comes across as being less about “how do we improve things” and more “I need someone to be angry at.” I would propose directing that anger at the politicians instead of your fellow voters.
Hence your substantive engagement on what I did mention?
I dish back that which has been dished out.
Never claimed this.
Implied.
Never claimed this.
So you are saying Democrats and Harris would’ve been better?
None of this is about hate, it’s about which policy decisions are better than others.
And Harris had overall better policy decisions, correct?
Again, never claimed.
So you agree Harris had overall better policy decisions, correct?
Everything you’re saying comes across as being less about “how do we improve things” and more “I need someone to be angry at.” I would propose directing that anger at the politicians instead of your fellow voters.
The two notions aren’t mutually-exclusive. You see, in order to improve things, fools asserting defeatist false equivalence fallacy rhetoric need to learn from their disastrous mistakes. Because you’re the one responsible, that is making you a bit uncomfortable, I suspect.
I would propose making less logical fallacies next election cycle.
Hence your substantive engagement on what I did mention?
Never claimed this.
Never claimed this.
None of this is about hate, it’s about which policy decisions are better than others.
Again, never claimed.
Everything you’re saying comes across as being less about “how do we improve things” and more “I need someone to be angry at.” I would propose directing that anger at the politicians instead of your fellow voters.
I dish back that which has been dished out.
Implied.
So you are saying Democrats and Harris would’ve been better?
And Harris had overall better policy decisions, correct?
So you agree Harris had overall better policy decisions, correct?
The two notions aren’t mutually-exclusive. You see, in order to improve things, fools asserting defeatist false equivalence fallacy rhetoric need to learn from their disastrous mistakes. Because you’re the one responsible, that is making you a bit uncomfortable, I suspect.
I would propose making less logical fallacies next election cycle.