• bus_factor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The issue with realizing the gains is that you have to relinquish control of your company bit by bit. However, you could have the company (which you likely control) give out dividends, or you could use the stock as collateral for a loan. Or just pay yourself a bigger salary.

    • moriquende@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a good question: is it okay for you as a person to control a company that has grown that large? Maybe nudging people to give up control of entities that large is a good side effect.

      • bus_factor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Give up control to whom? Some megacorp with infinite money would just buy a majority stake (often referred to as a hostile takeover) and wind up owning everything to an even larger extent than today.

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Sure, but that’s not what’s going to happen as a side effect of taxing unrealized gains, like what was discussed in this thread until now. A gradual transfer of ownership to the workers would have to be nudged in some other way.

            In competitive industries (read: tech) this does happen to some extent in the form of stock being part of the compensation, but that’s not going to happen organically for every employment situation.