• ooterness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yes, you agreed to the Terms of Service (aka Social Contract). For people in the USA, that includes the 4th amendment, which explicitly allows law enforcement (living or semi-living) to enter with a warrant. Therefore you have granted permission to enter.

    If they don’t have a warrant, or if they messed up the paperwork somehow, then they burst into flame.

    • async_amuro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Permission isn’t an invitation. They need to be invited in, not have permission to enter.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Can a vampire not break and enter? Would an invitation work if they were out of town and needed the vampire to cat sit for a weekend? Does you being in the house have an effect on the invitation or it deed based? How are renters handled? So many questions!

        If you’re like me, you’re frustrated with vampire law. Here at Vampire Law, we help to keep your invitations clear and any misunderstandings cleared up.

        • Yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Express, verbal consent if there is a person in the house. No one in the house = no need to grant permission.

      • 5765313496@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t know about that. So, if they ask, “can I come in?” and you say, “Yes.” then they still can’t come in?

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      But if you’re born in the USA, you didn’t agree to any ToS it was forced upon you at birth. Never chose to accept/agree to them, but obligated to follow them or face punishment.

      A contract signed under duress is invalid.

      • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        While birth is certainly a state of duress for everyone involved, the term would have extreme difficulty in just about any court (glances at the current state of US judicial system uh. mostly.) — though I get where you’re coming from and don’t entirely disagree.

        What a world it would be if those cosplaying porklets burst into flames simply by acting outside the Rules As Written. 🤩🥓🔥🤣 ACAB.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The protection is usually framed under the natural right to be safe at home, it has nothing to do with legal entitlements. i.e. someone considering a dwelling home makes it safe, not an arbitrary paper.