I bet a lot of people will slow because they will not read it or not really understand what they are accepting. Some will even share the new AI creating as something nice while they are giving up their private photos to Meta
Well look on the bright side. AI is about to become really good at drawing penises under fat bellies.
Don’t use their app. Web only.
Also, don’t use their website.
When you share with Facebook, you share with Trump.
Why do any of you still use facebook?
FB itself for a community group, and Messenger for my family group chat 🤷
The group now has a presence on Discord, but there are still 26 times as many members on FB. In Hungary many people still use FB as their main social network. At most they also use Instagram, but that obviously doesn’t work for closed discussion groups.
Remember when zuck asked for your nudes?
https://www.aol.com/facebook-asks-users-send-nude-144105362.html
God that’s ridiculous… the image hash depends on the image not having changed at all from the one uploaded by the user. If they’re screenshotted and cropped, or sent via a messaging platform that compresses them, they’ll be visually similar enough to not matter, and different enough to have a different hash. So, Zuck gets a free peek at your your nudes, and all you get is a false sense of security.
Yes and no, there are specific image hashing algorithms that attempt to add a likeness score.
These are already used with in the cloud to combat CSAM
This is just gross. Just another privacy invasion from the company that decided to track and de-anonymize people around the internet even while those people were doing all the right things to prevent it.
The distressing thing for me is knowing that a lot of my friends (and exes) are exactly the sort of people that’ll just absent-mindedly click OK without reading it and share every single photo they’ve ever taken of me; photos which Facebook’s facial recognition will easily tag.
This is exactly what they expect to happen. Who reads the fine print?
Because plenty of people care very little about data or security but see all those people on there… so explaining how it is bad matters little as they’ve used facebook for over a decade
Facebook is just socially accepted malware.
don’t have Facebook on your phone?
better yet, don’t have Facebook?
zero sympathy for anyone caught in this, you’ve all been warned for at least a decade on what supporting Facebook means, why get upset about this now?
I don’t have many pictures of myself on my own phone. Most pictures of me are on the phones of the people who took them.
The LAST thing I’d do with my mobile phone is install Facebook or Instagram. What a nightmare.
Unless you run a custom ROM, like LineageOS or GrapheneOS, you most probably have some Meta apps installed at system level.
This is Meta Services, as a system app which can only be disabled, on my work Samsung.
My mom has facebook and also has my photos.
Unless we can get EVERYONE to respect each others’ privacy, arsoning meta ceo until next one gets scared is the only option.
Nb4 a “bug” causes that setting to be true for all users just like with the cambridge analitica scandal
Yes. Just because the feature isn’t useful to you doesn’t mean it won’t be useful to others.
Can I have your SSN or credit card info? Maybe bank info? You obviously live handing out your into to large corporations so you won’t mind is having it too right?
Facebook works perfectly fine in browser, there’s literally no need for that shit app.
It actually doesn’t, they lock you out of messenger unless you’re using the app
Works just fine if you put your phone in desktop mode.
Get thee to messenger.com then. Save it as a PWA and its like having the app but you give Meta as little as possible.
messenger.com does not work on mobile, except if you switch your browser to desktop mode. It’s quite hard to use it, even lots of text become smaller, so lots of people wouldn’t keep using that
I use messenger on Facebook web through. I do have the app as well, but the web works.
If you’re still on Facebook, you’re probably not aware of what this means or why it’s a bad thing.
“Nice dick bro, ever wondered how it would look in a Studio Ghibli movie?”
That brings up a good point though. Based on just the screenshot here, it seems like the user wont have a choice of what gets uploaded. People keep some pretty raunchy photos on their phone sometimes. Even kids might have some questionable photos. This is just asking for trouble.
How long will it take for a sfw kid picture with pink cloths or a splash of red to be misinterpreted, generated and tied to that user? There was already a time on youtube when blood red cloths were getting people demonetized for gore.
