The Biden administration last week put a hold on a shipment of U.S.-made ammunition to Israel, two Israeli officials told Axios.

Why it matters: It is the first time since the Oct. 7 attack that the U.S. has stopped a weapons shipment intended for the Israeli military. The incident raised serious concerns inside the Israeli government and sent officials scrambling to understand why the shipment was held, Israeli officials said. President Biden is facing sharp criticism among Americans who oppose his support of Israel. The administration in February asked Israel to provide assurances that U.S.-made weapons were being used by Israel Defense Forces in Gaza in accordance with international law. Israel provided a signed letter of assurances in March.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    We’ve been shipping Israel ammo to kill Palestinians for over half a year. We only now stopped one shipment. Think about that.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I am no friend of Bibi or the IDFs action towards Palestinians, but let’s be fair - the northern border has been lit up lately, and Biden is still a self described Zionist. Not ‘defending’ the Jewish state is going to be a big line in the sand for him

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Seriously… When was the last time you talked to someone his age and changed their minds about something political?

        This is part of the danger with a de facto gerontocracy, to be ruled by bad ideas that, with a patina of age, enjoy the status of tradition.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It was initially for defense after a massacre when the Iron Dome was breached in October. That was completely justified support. The munitions sold since Netanyahu began indiscriminately killing Palestinians are not.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Agreed. It’s been the standard since Israel was conceived in 1948, but there are a lot more liberal people in Israel now. The ultra-orthodox make up only 13% now, and those are the conservatives that got Netanyahu into power. He only has a 15% approval rating since January, and there have been massive protests since March. Let’s hope they do the right thing with the next election and allow Palestinians access to their holy land.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That sounds like ignorant nationalism. I have Israeli-American friends that describe the party very differently. I may believe you if you could substantiate it with proof of their fascist left wing.

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                The very fact that their “left” still wants an apartheid state! There’s no Israeli left party that wants to give equal rights to Palestinians and return their homes.

                  • Count042@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    The trick here, that was even covered in that paper, is the difference between what Palestinians think a one state solution is and what Israelis think a one state solution is.

                    In that study they found the Palestinians viewed a single country with equal rights for all as a one state solution. The Israelis thought it meant a state with all of the territory but without the Palestinians.

                    Frankly, the liberal Israelis wouldn’t be for a one state solution if it also meant giving up the land and property stolen from the Palestinians through terrorism.

                    “Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds”

                    Watch how fast they’d turn right wing if property in west Jerusalem or east Jerusalem had to be given up.

      • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is the equivalent of someone taking your house and throwing you in the basement and then when you come out and attack decades later they fight back and say its for self defense. Please.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So Native Americans should just murder Americans until they leave? One state is the only equitable solution at this point.

          • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            1. I’m not against a one state solution
            2. Stolen land/property should be given back
            3. Your example is disanalgous, run the clock back to when the colonies were being formed. If a colonist from Europe came and took their house or the land they use or live on they have every right to fight back.
            4. If a colonist attacks me and kills my family I have a right to fight back. If I fight back then its not self defense for them but for me.
            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You’re right. It’s an imperfect analogy. The Jews that occupy Israel once lived in Israel. Settlers never originated in America. Also, the Jews didn’t take Israel from Palestinians by force, it was done by Truman and the UN with protest from Great Britain. The US is more to blame for the state of Israel than the Israelis.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The Zionist terrorist organizations that ethnically cleansed portions of Mandatory Palestine through murder sprees of civilians are responsible

                Stop posting the thesis of a dude going for his masters degree in history at ‘Old Dominion’ university written in 1980 as a source when this was recent enough that we literally have primary sources for what happened.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’ve been indiscriminately killing Palestinians long before October.

          And during that very long time, Eisenhower, Johnson, Ford, Nixon, Regan, Clinton, both Bushes, Carter, Obama, Trump and until recently Biden didn’t stop selling Israel weapons.

          And now Biden has started to cut them off.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              He did not. He withheld all aid from Israel, and then provided military aid under the agreement that they’d use it to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon. That was after he sold the weapons to Iran in the Iran-Contra scandal that ended up in the hands of Hezbollah.

              The man literally put this shit pot on the stove and started stirring. Do not glorify his actions in this conflict.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The previous attacks were attacks on Hamas, not Palestinians. If Israel always wanted to kill all Palestinians, that would’ve been done in 1985 when this conflict started. Netanyahu has been using the attack on Oct. 7 to justify the shift in tactics from Hamas to “we can’t tell them apart.”

          • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Hamas isn’t even in the West Bank yet Shireen Abu Akleh was murdered there in 2022, while clearly marked as a journalist. There are so many incidents I could pull up as examples of indiscriminate killings but your ignorance is not worth my time.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m not saying the IDF didn’t kill Palestinians before Oct 7th. I’m saying they began targeting both Hamas and Palestinians alike after the attack.

              • bamboo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Israel only came into existence following ethic cleansing committed against civilians in 1947-1948. Israel has targeted civilians its entire history.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            1. No, all the children shot during the March of Return were not Hamas, nor were the thousands killed before 2006.

            2. Palestinians have a right to resist. Israel, being an illegitimate settler apartheid state, has no such right. Attacks on Hamas are not justified.

                • rusticus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You say in a thread where the current president has delayed weapons delivery for the first time in 50 years. STFU

                  • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    It’s not because he personally wants to, go check what he’s on the record as saying his entire career. This isn’t something to applaud, this is him trying to avoid political blowback. You think we should stop applying pressure because of a single descision?

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Correct. Killing Palestinians is not justified. What I wrote was providing defense to an ally that was just attacked is standard, and justified.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nobody needs 2000lb bombs - which the US itself doesn’t use because they blow up entire quarters and have massive collateral damage - for defense.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Biden never had to start circumventing congress to sell weapons in the first place. His hands have never been tied here.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          True, but hopefully he now realizes the error of his ways. Young people overwhelmingly do not support the US’s support of Israel. He knows more about what is happening there than any of us do, and he was all for it until this possible shipment halt. Maybe he’s finally realized that bibi has gone too far.