• SatyrSack@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 个月前

    Direct link to article:

    https://news.itsfoss.com/mastodon-link-problem/

    TL;DR:

    When you share a link on Mastodon, a link preview is generated for it, right?

    With Mastodon being a federated platform (a part of the Fediverse), the request to generate a link preview is not generated by just one Mastodon instance. There are many instances connected to it who also initiate requests for the content almost immediately.

    And, this “fediverse effect” increases the load on the website’s server in a big way.

    Does Lemmy not cause this issue? Other federated software was not mentioned in the article at all.

    • chameleon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 个月前

      Lemmy (and Kbin for that matter) very much do the same thing for posts. I don’t think they fetch URL previews for links in comments, but that doesn’t matter: posts and comments are both fairly likely to end up spreading to Mastodon/etc anyway, so even comments will trigger this cascade.

      Direct example: If you go to mastodon.social, stick @fediverse@lemmy.world in the search box at the topleft and click for the profile, you can end up browsing a large Mastodon server’s view of this community, and your very link has a preview. (Unfortunately, links to federated communities just result in a redirect, so you have to navigate through Mastodon’s UI.)

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 个月前

      So the preview should be federated as well?

      How many requests are we actually talking about here, though? Is that better or worse than everyone clicking the link?

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 个月前

        There’s some problem with a federated previews: tricking one instance into generating the wrong preview would spread to every instance. It’s been exploited for malware and scam campaigns in message apps.

          • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 个月前

            Masquerading a normal looking link for another one, usually phishing, malware, clones loaded with ads.

            Like, lets say I post something like

            https://www.google.com

            And also have my instance intercept it to provide Google’s embed preview image, and it federates that with other instances.

            Now, for everyone it would look like a Google link, but you get Microsoft Google instead.

            I could also actually post a genuine Google link but make the preview go somewhere else completely, so people may see the link goes where they expect even when putting the mouse over it, but then they end up clicking the preview for whatever reason. Bam, wrong site. Could also be a YouTube link and embed but the embed shows a completely different preview image, you click on it and get some gore or porn instead. Fake headlines, whatever way you can think of to abuse this, using the cyrillic alphabet, whatever.

            People trust those previews in a way, so if you post a shortened link but it previews like a news article you want to go to, you might click the image or headline but end up on a phony clone of the site loaded with malware. Currently, if you trust your instance you can actually trust the embed because it’s generated by your instance.

            On iMessage, it used that the sender would send the embed metadata, so it was used for a zero click exploit by sending an embed of a real site but with an attachment that exploited the codec it would be rendered with.

      • Rimu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 个月前

        2 requests per instance - one for the HTML of the page and another for a preview image.