• CursedByTheVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Potatoes, pasta, bread, legumes, nut butters, vegetables, fruits, jelly, jam; all things that many people already eat with some regularity.

    Time and resources are hardly an excuse, you don’t have to spend two hours a night preparing some 5 Michelin star meal with the most organic, non-GMO, [insert buzzword] ingredients in order to make better dietary choices, at least not in the first world where we have ample options… Shit, even just reducing your meat intake by 10% is a net harm reduction that adds up.

    The slave labor thing is valid to an extent, but not entirely analogous. For better or for worse, modern society is increasingly dependent on technology; folks rely on it, in some form, to find/perform work, pay the bills, stay in contact with friends and family, survive the climate they live in, travel, etc… This isn’t typically the case with meat, it’s often just carnal desire which results in the death of something to the tune of ~80 billion, with a “B”, animals every year that didn’t really need to be slaughtered.

    People absolutely should be upset about the conditions of workers being exploited anywhere in the world and advocate on their behalf where possible, but our position shouldn’t be: “Oh, some bad shit happened over here, so I guess it’s fine to allow this bad shit over here to proliferate as well”… just sayin’.

    • CopernicusQwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’s often just carnal desire which results in the death of something to the tune of ~80 billion (with a “B”) animals every year that didn’t really need to be slaughtered.

      I’m genuinely curious: what’s the vegans’ answer to the question of “what happens to the cattle and other livestock if everyone on the planet turned vegan tomorrow?”. It’s not like they can just be let loose…

      Realistically the amount of livestock is not sustainable and they’d need to be culled in gargantuan numbers so that they don’t go from a “managed” ecological disaster to an “out of control” ecological disaster. And then you get the slaughter without the benefit of feeding billions of hungry people.

      • borderstolutenfolk@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not vegan, but this does not follow from the premise you set out with.

        Most animals are slaughtered after around one year. Calf/piglet/lamb is taken away early so the mother can become pregnant. She becomes pregnant through artificial means in most cases, or at the least in an organized fashion.

        These ‘gargantuan’ numbers of animals we need to cull would not be more than we slaughter at present, if everyone went vegan. No more mechanical pregnanies, no more offspring, and no need for culling beyond the first thirteen months. Of course, I have never heard a vegan talk about changing all meat eaters overnight, so this is an unlikely scenario, but even if that is your premise, it doesn’t hold up.