• delgato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I endorse nuclear power and am enjoying the second look it is getting now but as a geologist I ask where the nuclear waste will go. No one ever wants to talk about it and there is really easy solution, the deep subsurface (miles below the ground). It’s safe, cheap, and Finland has shown how it’s done.

    This is part of a broader issue in preparing our next generations for jobs of the future. To build out this infrastructure you need smart technical people to make it work and ask the tough questions, but I know this administration doesn’t care about that.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      The solutions exist and the USA has been aware of those solutions since they invented nuclear power in the 50’s. Unfortunately Capitalism doesn’t allow long-term planning so almost every time a long-term storage solution has been proposed, or ever funded, a few elections later it get’s defunded to the praised of misguided environmentalists and the green-washing fossil fuel lobby.

      The one I know about the most was Yucca Mountain which got defunded. But at least WiPP is back open. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Isolation_Pilot_Plant

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Nuclear waste is not and has never been an issue worth discussing. It’s almost exclusively invoked by antinuclear advocates.

    • Avatar of Vengeance@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Look I hear you, the way the US does nuclear power has a lot of issues, it’s really an industry that requires strong state backing like what China and Russia have going on.