• danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    No. It’s deliberately breaking backwards compatibility to force other projects that use that code to either look bland like Gnome or stop making their DE’s.

    That’s bad for FLOSS and Linux users

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, it’s theming their own project to look however they want it to.

      bland like Gnome

      Gnome looks amazing. It’s objectively the most consistent and polished DE out there, and IMO the best looking one.

      or stop making their DE’s.

      Lmao is this what you think? There’s a secret cabal of Gnome developers who think that by making the Libadwaita theme and using it in Gnome apps, it will kill other DEs? Can you actually hear yourself? That conspiracy theory doesn’t even make sense.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Who said anything about a conspiracy? I’m just saying they may be acting selfishly and it couldn’t hurt to speak to other parties who they know use their code, to discuss how it will impact them.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You did. To quote your assertion:

          It’s deliberately breaking backwards compatibility to force other projects that use that code to either look bland like Gnome or stop making their DE’s.

          You’re asserting that the Gnome team is secretly working together (i.e. conspiring) with the explicit aim of enforcing DEs to look like Gnome (idk how they could force that but whatever), or to stop making their DEs altogether (similarly, I can’t see the logic there. Unless you believe that only Gnome devs are skilled enough to make Linux programs and therefore other DEs have to take what Gnome makes. But that’s an absurd suggestion).

          • danielfgom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s not a conspiracy. All I was saying is that by breaking backwards compatibility downstream either has to comply or find another way.

            As another commentor has mentioned, gnome did actually inform downstream a good while back but downstream did not engage, so gnome obviously proceeded with their own project how they saw fit. Which is the right way of course.

            Downstream should have tried to engage and perhaps found a good work around but sadly didn’t.

            So they’ll have to work it out now by themselves.