sag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoChad VLClemm.eeimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageChad VLClemm.eesag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoForget playback. How was that video file recorded? How do you even store data that fast, let alone encode it?
minus-squareulterno@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoOhhhhhh. It’s a video decoder torture test. “If your app can play this it can play anything” sort of deal. That makes sense. Also makes sense that VLC puked.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago I think you need hardware acceleration for a video like this. ok but why would anyone have a video like that
minus-squareulterno@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?
minus-squaretortiscu@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package
minus-squareBelgdore@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoMaybe some kind of super slow motion high resolution type thing?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYeah I could definitely see this for slo-mo and data recording in an actual laboratory setting that requires it to be as accurate as humanly possible. Idk if this is a standard though I’m not a scientist.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agobut if you’re gonna watch it in slow motion anyways then why isn’t it saved as a slow video that is much longer?
minus-squareDacoTaco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoVlc has hardware acceleration afaik. I think its more a case of the ffmpeg codec not supporting it yet because what the actual fuck haha
minus-squaregentooer@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoYeah, I think it’s a good idea to try ffplay if VLC (or mpv) fail.
minus-squarepwndave@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoRight! Sorry, I assumed this was regular JPEG
deleted by creator
Where can I try this
deleted by creator
Forget playback. How was that video file recorded? How do you even store data that fast, let alone encode it?
1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?
deleted by creator
Ohhhhhh. It’s a video decoder torture test. “If your app can play this it can play anything” sort of deal. That makes sense.
Also makes sense that VLC puked.
deleted by creator
ok but why would anyone have a video like that
1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?
deleted by creator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package
Maybe some kind of super slow motion high resolution type thing?
Yeah I could definitely see this for slo-mo and data recording in an actual laboratory setting that requires it to be as accurate as humanly possible. Idk if this is a standard though I’m not a scientist.
but if you’re gonna watch it in slow motion anyways then why isn’t it saved as a slow video that is much longer?
Vlc has hardware acceleration afaik. I think its more a case of the ffmpeg codec not supporting it yet because what the actual fuck haha
Yeah, I think it’s a good idea to try ffplay if VLC (or mpv) fail.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
JPEG2000 = not lossless
deleted by creator
Right! Sorry, I assumed this was regular JPEG