Kind of a vague question. But I guess anyone that responds can state their interpretation.
Edit: I guess I’m asking because everything I’ve learned about America seems to not be what I was told? Idk how to explain it. Like it feels like USA is one event away from a civil war and turning into a D class country.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. As someone from a country currently going through civil war, the US is nowhere near close.
Were you still living there while tensions rose?
What sorts of things did you notice?
No. I haven’t lived there since I was 6. I am extremely lucky.
I have family there and the only news I hear are bad. I’m also still a citizen of the country and I’m worried it might break apart and I’ll end up stateless.
I kind of use that term lightly. I don’t mean an outright war exactly… I just mean organized corruption.
Sorry you’re going through that. Civil war is a tragedy no matter where or why.
The difference with America is, I think, that ours has already come and gone, but it never really did go away because we failed to stamp it out and rebuild properly. The rebellion was romanticized and whitewashed, sanitized and lionized. It’s always said that the south lost the war and won the peace. It’s probably never going to break out into a full-on fighting war like it was, but it exists very much as a bane on our social fabric, the integrity of our institutions, and our socioeconomics. America can never become as good as its advertising until it has reckoned with its deepest schisms.
To answer OP’s question: The America I was raised to believe in (this one, to put it succinctly) doesn’t exist. I emigrated with my family to the UK, my ancestral family home. Without America, me, my wife, and child probably could never have existed, coming together from different parts of the world as our families did. I’m glad of that, but we had to divest ourselves from its fate or remain complicit in tyranny and war. My process of disillusionment began before I was even fully grown, over 20 years ago, when the towers fell and I began to start asking questions about how we got to that point, and why we reacted as we did.
No matter where life takes me I’ll probably always stand for the enlightenment ideals of that mythical America I was raised to believe in, but it exists for me as a platonic ideal, a sort of mathematical absolute that can only ever be badly approximated in real world terms.
Every country is different.
I would say at least in the American civil war I know who to root for. In ours we’ve got a corrupt kleptocratic oppressive government turned military junta vs a genocidal militia headed by a rich and powerful warlord with ties to the Russian Wagner group. And oh by the way the militia was supported and enabled by the former regime as they used it to hold onto power but now it’s turned against them. So it’s like “pick your poison”. I thank my lucky stars I don’t live there but I also stopped following the news cause it’s horrible.
I agree America has some serious problems but they’re just not on the same level as the 3rd world.
I hate to say it but your description could be two or three different countries in the world I can think of. I’m going to guess Sudan?
Correct. Sudan.
I’m very sorry for what is happening to your country right now. Please stay safe and know that someone on the other side of the world is thinking about you and wishing you well.
That’s awful beyond words. I don’t know what’s worse, the fact that you’re caught in that, or that Wagner is so vilely prolific that what you’ve told me doesn’t even narrow it down to the continent.
It’s Sudan. War’s been raging since April of last year. The war is between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces, a militia responsible for a ethnic genocides in Darfur years ago that are now being repeated.
Also I’m not caught up in that at all. Some extended family is. But I’m very very lucky to have been living somewhere else since I was 6.
I’ve heard a bit about it. That’s a really messy one and it’s really hard to see things getting better anytime soon.
that’s not a nation, just 4 corporations in a trench coat.
Okay but which nation isn’t?
Cuba?
France. Motherfuckers will go on strike at the drop of a hat. I wish, at least in Canada, we had the same kind of guts. Quebec is the closest but not nearly close enough.
I love the French for being the most outspoken people among the European countries and having a ton of good initiatives going on. But don’t idolize them, most of their population is just as braindead and complacent as the rest of us Europeans, and their general unwillingness to speak English like most other Europeans hinders the spreading of their radical initiatives in the rest of Europe. (Sorry for the blatant generalizing. Not every French, not every European, …)
Ah, yes, strike, the national sport of France.
It depends. America is really big, so it needs more corporations to fill a coat.
The Uk is just 1.5 corporations in a trench coat
And a royal family.
You seen their estates? They’re the half corporation
I would say that the only thing that makes a nation genuine is that there is land that a government can control, defend and administrate.
Which also makes a lot of unrecognized nations still nations. And I’m fine with that. Taiwan is the most obvious example, but another would be Somaliland.
I find nations problematic because they are units that are too large and therefore are controlled by groups not easily overseen and almost impossible to make accountable by the population.
The USA is not only a nation but an empire, which is like a nation with an integrated, violently imposed pyramid scheme.
If only we could find a way to organize into independent smaller units that federate into larger units and remain tolerant of the differences of the smaller units. Ironically that is what the USA seems to have attempted to do with their united states thing?
Europe seems more successful on that front.
To a degree, but recent years have definitely shown the flaws of the EU model as it currently is. I do have some faith that the EU can and will reform itself to overcome those problems, as it is still a very young entity in the grand scheme of things and is generally quite effective legislatively. Things like Brexit and Hungary’s obstructionism show that it is currently far too easy for governments within the EU to scapegoat it for local problems, and the Syrian migrant crisis really tested the unity of it.
The US tried that. It was called the Articles of Confederation. It didn’t really work out.
A lot of that is politicians creating an ‘us - them’ situation and the news sensationalizing it because it makes people watch which is revenue. That said, the Republican party has gone completely off the deep end. I have some friends that are very worried. I have some friends who believe strongly enough in our system of checks and balances that they’re not terribly worried, just irritated and frustrated.
The most fundamental aspect of a nation is to be able to enforce your sovereignty against anyone that thinks you’re not a “genuine nation” and the US probably does this better than most nations in the world.
So very genuine.
I guess that’s not what I’m thinking either. It just feels like the “image” of America isn’t what America actually is. Like there’s a marketed campaign to make things seem better than they actually are.
That is just every country, countries would hardly try to look worse than they are.
I mean, yeah stuff like “land of the free”, “the land of opportunity” or “the american dream” are just slogans. But I think most people realise that by now.
“The American dream” was socioeconomic mobility, that shit is for commies these days.
I don’t think you can have a single image of America. What applies in one place doesn’t apply somewhere else.
The Oregon Tourism department put together a wonderful campaign showing how different we are, you couldn’t run this even across the border in Washington or Northern California:
The image of USA is not good, at all, if that’s what you’re asking. I used to care, but some time around 2016 I simply gave up. Something about an obvious grifter and professional fuckwit, seriously considered to lead anything other than a burger to his fat face. The alternative, although infinitely better, is clearly suffering from some dementia. It’s just a shit show.
And that’s just the politics. But it mirrors most other fucked up things in the US. The obvious and effective approaches are not considered. So… best to not spend too much effort and hope the impact of it reaching critical mass isn’t too bad.
Genuine in what sense? Like is it a ‘real’ country kind of genuine? I don’t see why it wouldn’t be.
I guess it depends on what you mean by “genuine”?
The US, federally, is a single country, but socially and regionally, it’s 50 separate states.
Nobody is going to confuse the overall social climate in my home state of Oregon with, say, Texas, or even our own neighbor, Idaho.
Yeah, we are a nation, but I can definitely see how we might look a bit dysfunctional from the outside.
First and foremost, remember that it is very rare for someone to write an article or post about things that are doing just fine. So you are mostly going to hear about disagreements or angry opponents or laws that are problematic. That kind of content gets more views.
I’ll also say that our 2 party system is practically designed to cause division and arguments. And it is always at its worst during presidential election years. But at the average citizen level, most of us are just going about our lives with no pent up malice for those who don’t see the world the same as us. We definitely have generalizations in our head about people from other areas of the country, but with a few radical exceptions, the vast majority of Americans view ourselves as a nation. Even if we don’t agree on a lot of the details.
Its a genuine nation in the sense it has sovereignty through projection of force and, agreement with other nations.
do you perhaps mean it wasn’t founded upon genuine ideals? As in it was founded “by the people for the people” but that might not necessarily be the case?
One event away from civil war
The previous civil war didn’t actually quash those who supported the confederacy - it even allowed traitors to be treated like war heros, and have statues put up. No other nation, as far as I am aware, celebrates their traitors in the same way they celebrate the victors.
It may have been white picket fences and opportunity before my lifetime but I never seen it. Feels like its all been milked dry and you got to run the hamster wheel or starve.
The rich call the shots in government since they just bribe and whine till they get what they want.
Americans are all bark and no bite domestically (I know where the big evil worldwide). I don’t think anyone has the balls to push a civil war. Even Trumps cultist folded after someone got shot attacking the capital.
I guess I’m asking because everything I’ve learned about America seems to not be what I was told? Idk how to explain it. Like it feels like USA is one event away from ~~a civil war~~ outright corruption and turning into a D class country.
Might be time to check how much doomscrolling you’re doing. You can drive from Miami to Seattle and you’ll just run into the same dude but with maybe a different flair.
The news and politicians try their hardest to make it look like we’re one single-issue vote bait away from war.
I’m continually disappointed that America doesn’t live up to what I learned about in civics class 30 years ago.
I have clear memories of sitting in class as a kid, asking the most basic questions about checks and balances, separation of powers, equality under the law etc. and being absolutely mesmerized by the topics. I remember thinking, “wow, I live there? I’m so lucky.”
When my teacher said “not even the president is above the law” I remember some other kid really trying to grasp the idea that every single person is supposed to be treated equally by the justice system, regardless of their family, job, or religion. It wasn’t a concept that came naturally to everyone.
It wasn’t until high school and college that I finally understood that these were just ideals that we talk about but don’t fully actualize. America is not the unicorn we think it is, but we’re great at lying to ourselves from a very young age. Howard Zinn was a big part of my waking up to reality.
That’s not to say we don’t strive for improvement, but when one of the two political parties is hell-bent on dismantling the administrative state, taking away bodily autonomy for more than half the population, reverting our ‘culture’ and laws to the 1800s, destroying our planet, discarding science, fetishizing killing-machines in daily life and warfare across the globe, and so much more regressive bullshit, we’re not really setting ourselves up to realize those ideals.
America is 2 continents with dozens of nations and countries.
This is all variations on what came before. Cops getting called on students protesting the genocide in Palestine? Saw it during Vietnam. Trump fuckery in the elections? See Kennedy interfering with Cuba and Nixon with Watergate.
Nixon wiretapped the DNC. A sitting president. Wiretapped. His political opponents. Then he left office and got pardoned.
If Trump makes it through all these trials unscathed, I will not be surprised. If this feels new, it’s only because we whitewash stuff in history books and it feels different now because 1) it’s current and 2) the Internet makes it harder for only one narrative to take over.
I feel like touching up the history books and even other teaching is a disservice to humanity. It’s like it’s an active set up for failure or abuse. I was never taught anything realistic 20 years ago. It’s like I was cattle for someone else’s sick dream.
I have to wonder if both our teachers (the good ones in elementary, at least) meant to inform us about how it should work, because that was all we could grasp at the time? Maybe it was their (misguided?) attempt to make us experience serious anger and feel called to action as we discover the truth of the system for ourselves. I’m a teacher, and I have sometimes realized students are not capable of understanding a complex situation, and in those cases I have attempted to at least ensure they understand I am giving them an idealized, simplified perspective of that situation that does not apply to how it works in reality. I try to plant the seeds for a critical understanding in the future, but I am sure there are students out there that believe I lied to them about how the world really works.
ETA: added “good” to modify “ones” in first sentence for clarity
I don’t think you can get more genuine than a south Florida gator wrassler speed balling meth in his taint while voting against his own interests. Genuine does not equal intelligent or bestow leadership abilities.