We must only support candidates whose main policy position is electoral reform.

Current as in today? Or then-current (pre-exodus)?

Is that actually astounding?

He’s mainly dealing with depression.

Defining ethics is a question as old as philosophy itself.

His cronies are at all levels of government, including many red state election officials.

A7C paired with a Sigma 28-70 and occasional Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 makes for beautiful family photography.

Are you suggesting that aid be stopped completely because we can’t guarantee that none of it is being used for military purposes?

You ok?

Don’t get too excited; he’s left-handed.

Well the $70,000 average recouped per person in this effort would certainly imply that those targeted are indeed “rich”, or at least high income.

Obviously both can be true, depending on perspective. But being rich is a spectrum.

If you’re a poor studen, the 40 year old who can pay cash for a car but cannot retire still may seem rich but could very well be firmly middle class.

Someone in their 20s who never has to work is more likely to be considered rich by most anyone’s standards. But someone in their 70s who is living modestly in retirement would still meet your second definition but few would consider them actually rich.

I think using net worth is a better measuring stick. In the US someone worth more than $10m is almost certainly living very well off and most would consider them rich.

Does that somehow mean they’re not rich?

Let Dr Feynman guide you through this question.

Indeed. I no longer buy Anker as a result.

always better for the consumer

Always?

It’s going to get worse.

You thought those wouldn’t affect you???

My life has been unduly burdened because of my “dick too big” problem. So many don’t understand my plight.

Pray for me.

Agreed. Lots of reasonable opinions (not just my own) get downvoted here.

I’ve never been a fan of using downvotes as a disagree button and the issue seems even worse here than Reddit.