• no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Still a better company for consumers than most.

    I’m saying consumers because it certainly isn’t great for the forests.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      For sure, though my family members that have worked for them for a long time say the company is changing in some pretty shitty ways internally

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, I don’t know much about the inside of the thing. I’ve got some friends who’ve worked there and had a positive experience, but I’m in Sweden and I’ve no idea how things are internationally.

        • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I still have a blast walking around and the build quality from most collections has been up to par if not improved on past pieces.

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Show me it surviving a moving truck ONCE and I’m sold. So VERY little Ikea gear can make it. Hemnes, Brimnes, Early Billy, Efectiv, etc.

              Pine grows fast in managed forests. It’s actually renewable. Bring back Pine if we can’t have anything better.

    • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      And they don’t pay taxes, apparently. So yeah we’re getting cheap furniture but I do wonder if the net benefit to society would be better if they paid tax.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Which type of taxes? Income? Property? Payroll? Something else?

        If I remember correctly, all their designs are owned by a non-profit charity (that they own), and the for-profit business pays royalties to the charity. Charities aren’t taxed as much as businesses, if at all.

        Similarly, parts of Ikea that are in countries with high tax rates funnel their revenue to subsidiaries thay are in countries with low tax rates, as royalty payments, business expenses, etc. to shift the tax burden to the favorable country.

        • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Here.

          I should mention this link is from a tax firm almost glorifying the way that ikea has structured themselves. It’s a very charitable reading of the situation.

          Just google IKEA tax, there’s tons of sources on their alleged tax evasion, including it seems claims by the EU that the Netherlands facilitates it.

          I see this as corporate greed pure and simple. There is no reason people should be starving and unhoused while IKEA dodges taxes.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I see - this is kinda what I was thinking too. I rmemebe reading about it a while back.

            from a tax firm almost glorifying the way that ikea has structured themselves. It’s a very charitable reading of the situation.

            The thing is that it’s likely that everything Ikea is doing is legal, so tax firms would be taking notes (after all, their goal is to ensure their customers pay as little tax as is legally allowed)