• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Here’s an easy decision… stop blocking the international community from pursuing diplomatic and economic remedies that would pressure Isreal to not commit genocide. Stop supplying military aide (potentially excepting the specialized hardware to maintain the iron dome).

    Sounds like a pretty fucking easy solution…

    Sounds like the Biden administration is taking a needlessly hard path just to appease AIPAC and similar foreign actors.

    It’s important not to fall into a purely majority rule situation, but the Jewish community in America is divided on this matter… we can’t let the minority of a minority that’s in favor of this genocide steer international policy.

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      How is that easy?

      Biden has to support Israel. It’s a centerpiece of us foreign policy for a reason; they want a friend in the region, and there is huge support from his constituents. It’s basically politically impossible to say no.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nobody needs a friend so badly that they’re justified in making friends with a genocidal maniac. I understand that Israel has been a long-term investment, but the amount of human suffering going on right now vastly outweighs any lamentations about sunk cost. What this country needs is a president willing to show that he cares about preventing suffering above all else. Doctors take an oath to both do good and do no harm - it’s time for our presidents to do the same, and be held to it to the same degree.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        We don’t need Isreal as a strategic partner - we’re on good terms with the UAE, Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia and generally good terms with Turkey, Oman and Iraq - Isreal isn’t foundational to American security, America is foundational to Isreali security.

        • Bye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You say that, but americas actions paint a totally diffedifferent picture. They are joined at the hip with Israel and that isn’t going to change easily.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            That isn’t for strategic reasons though… it’s because most Americans want a peaceful Isreal to exist (partially because the holocaust was awful, partially because we’ve got a large jewish population, partially because we like underdogs and partially because racism) and the fact that Isreal is inciting violence is just now reaching some people. I think public opinion is moving hard away from Isreal but, historically, most Americans supported giving them outrageous levels of aide.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The entire bottom paragraph of what you said is entirely wrong. I support Palestine and stopping Israel, but a majority of Jewish people (62%) in the US are fine with the war and the direction it’s going in. As are most Americans. Your point of not having majority rule is true to some extent, but it’s hard to argue that while also knowing that not respecting Majority rule is how we got the first trump administration… Data

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        As are most Americans.

        Weird to correct someone and then just add in an extra bonus fact that’s wrong. Unless you’re claiming “not sure” is “fine with”, which it isn’t. “Fine with” is “acceptable”.

        About four-in-ten U.S. adults (38%) say Israel’s conduct of the war has been acceptable, and 34% say it has been unacceptable. The remaining 26% are unsure.

        And more importantly, these aren’t random samples of the population. Dem/Lean Dem respondents said Israel’s conduct is unacceptable by 52-22.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2024/02/25/biden-election-jews-evangelicals-support-gaza-ceasefire/72672589007/

        It’s a bit more complicated I think and the polling is pretty close. Here’s a survey from about a month ago that puts the divide closer to 50/50. I suppose a better way to word my last paragraph is either “half a minority” or “a portion of a minority”.

        I did want to highlight the Jewish community’s opinion though because I think the division there is extremely telling - and because I know the evangelical community is all in on genocide but, imo: they’re a bunch of fucking idiots, I don’t care what they think, and their opinions are irrelevant to politics because most of them will vote for Trump come hell or high water.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t disagree - but in terms of this election everyone who considers themselves a Trump republican is unswayable… but there are a lot of folks outraged at Netanyahu who may refuse to vote at all.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’ll not hear any disagreements from me - but even here on lemmy you’ll find people who are planning to refrain from voting because they morally object to voting for someone who is supporting genocide. That’s a very fair morale stance in the abstract but in this case you’ve got two real choices and choosing not to vote is inviting even more death.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You’re right, and it’s sad. They really don’t understand how much worse it’ll be if they put their pride in front of the polls. I’m voting reluctantly out of fear of the repercussions of another Trump presidency, and I’m older than average on here. They have so much more to lose that won’t just “come back” with the next election.

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    He’s got a super easy solution:

    “Sorry Israel, but you fucked up royally! We’re suspending all aid; recognizing the state of Palestine as an independent nation, and will begin the process of rebuilding Gaza and reappropriating all of your illegal settlements on their land.”

    Simple!

    • Xhieron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Okay. We’re joining BRICS. Mr. Putin loves genocide, and he’s really going to love all this American tech we can show him.”

      Simple indeed.

        • Xhieron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Tomorrow? Of course not. Inside the decade? Absolutely. Saudi-Israel relations are thawing as we speak, and that hostility basically dates since the foundation of the modern Israeli state. If Israel and Iran suddenly find themselves on the same side of geopolitics (i.e., if both of them are American enemies because apparently a lot of Lemmings think we should break diplomatic relations with Israel altogether, meaning that Israel is on the side of China, Russia, etc.), then anything is possible.

          What would Bibi’s alternative be? Go it alone?

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Israel just attacked Iran, who then responded by shooting a bunch of rockets at them literally just days ago. I also don’t think Iran is going to back Israel while they’re slaughtering a bunch of Palestinians. Furthermore Bibi isn’t going to be around forever and it remains to be seen if the rest of the Israeli leadership follows in his footsteps once he’s gone.

            • Xhieron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re right. Forging any kind of working relationship between Israel and Iran would be extremely challenging. I guess maybe Israel and the US should try to find a path forward as allies.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I see no issue with forging a path forward as allies provided they end their genocide and occupation. I mean, what else is there really to be done short of that?

      • Ruxias@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        US sells/provides/uses so many armaments around the world that it’s laughable to think Russia doesn’t already have their hands on at least a vast chunk of our “tech”. Surely trying to reverse-engineer what they can, as I’m sure any

        Usually it’s the manufacture process of tech that is the “secret sauce”.

  • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Isn’t it obvious, Joe?

    “While I condemn Hamas, and supported Israel’s right to defend itself in the aftermath of the attacks, the use of force in reprisal has become excessive - beyond what is justified or acceptable. So effective immediately, I’m halting all arms shipments to Israel, and calling on President Netanyahu to withdraw IDF troops from Gaza and the West Bank.”

    Problem solved.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      He honestly thinks AIPAC is going to win him his election and not his pissed off voterbase lol.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not that simple though; Israel wants to eliminate Hamas (and they have plenty of reason for that – if Mexico attacked the US like Hamas attacked Israel, there would simply put no longer be a Mexico).

      It would be tone deaf to Israel to say “leave Gaza” without that mission accomplished. They claim they don’t even want the area, they just want Hamas gone.

      Furthermore, Hamas is fighting with guerilla tactics. They’re intentionally trying to provoke war crimes. Israel doesn’t have to be so dang willing to fall for the trap. However, Hamas is making it exceptionally hard to fight a clean war from what I’ve read. Citizens in the Gaza strip are not just being abused by the IDF but by Hamas.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Biden has his own Intel to back that all up. If it were as obvious as people want it to be, I’m pretty sure we would’ve stopped sending aid by now.

      • urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Mexico attacked the US like Hamas attacked Israel

        Bad comparison. Mexico is an independent nation recognized by the UN. No nation disputes it’s sovereignty over it’s lands.

        Palestine is dependent on Israel. Israel controls the flow of people and goods from it’s borders. Israel controls electrical power to Palestine. Israel geographically surrounds Palestine.

        One actor holds all the cards here. One actor has the power to improve conditions in Gaza (people don’t generally choose to support violent militants for no reason) and chooses to bomb it.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No nation disputes it’s sovereignty over it’s lands.

          That’s not true, see Ukraine and plenty of other nations over history.

          Mexico is also the closest to “has a terrorist organization capable of carrying out an attack near the scale of 9-11 living right next door and running the government.”

          You’re right it isn’t even close because the US government would never let it get that close.

          Israel geographically surrounds Palestine.

          Neither the Gaza strip (where all the fighting is going on AFAIK) or the west bank are “geographically surrounded.” I checked a map because you legit made me question my geography.

          One actor has the power to improve conditions in Gaza

          I don’t think that’s entirely fair either. Israel can’t “fix” Palestine anymore than the US can fix the problems in Mexico … unless they take over Palestine. Nobody wants that…

          They could definitely do more to let aid in. They could definitely do better about not hitting civilian targets… But this is not a “just do nothing and everything will get better silly Israel” situation. I think that’s a pretty absurd take as popular it seems here.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Mexico attacking the US is an invalid comparison. Palestine isn’t attacking Israel, Hamas is

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You do understand Hamas, the same Hamas that attacked Israel, is effectively the government of the Gaza strip right? The Palestinian authority had no recognized authority there.

            So that’s also a “terrible metaphor” because “it would be like the government of Mexico was the drug cartels, the drug cartels (which are the government) attacked the US and we in retaliation started bombing Mexico out of existence.”

            There’s no perfect metaphor.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Even if he’d just say “I hear you and you’re right, but sometimes I have to make bad choices for the country that are better for the long term” would be something.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well… He also has very few friends in Israel. Bibi prefers Trump (who recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, which was a Bad Thing), and the way he’s forcing Biden to eat shit right now seems like a pretty easy way to put his thumb on the scale.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lmao even if he did that right this second, people would still be bitching that he didn’t do it months ago. Sure, it would have been great if he had started off that way, but what’s past is past, and if you want him to change course, then let the fucker change course

      • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        So 10 minutes after someone murders someone and they say I won’t do that again, we should just say “the past is the past and at least he’s not murdering anymore”?

        Biden needs to be held accountable for the role he played in the genocide in Gaza. The right thing to do would be for him to end it at any cost, but he still needs to be held accountable for his crimes.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That would be nice, but iirc he needs a legal justification or an act passed by congress to actually halt arms shipments. He made moves not too long ago against a specific part of the Israeli military that was found to be committing war crimes, which Netanyahu is opposing. If we get lucky, he might be able to use Netanyahu’s lack of cooperation to suspend or halt military aid entirely. His rhetoric has been trending in that direction, so I’m hopeful.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The Leahy Law. And the one unit they went after was smoke for the entire operation in Gaza. They aren’t letting men leave the combat area right now. Just detaining and torturing them. This isn’t just one problem unit.

      • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are you lying to yourself or to us? He just signed a bill to give them billions of dollars and veto every resolution the UN comes up with while also trying to block the arrest warrant. You need to actually do some research and stop watching DNC propaganda news networks.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re cracking down harder on these protesters than the January 6th insurrectionists lol.

    • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Trump was in charge on J6. The failure to crack down then, is in part due to Trump intentionally not cracking down. I would compare this to the heavy handed crackdown on the DC Black Lives Matter protesters. You know, the one where he heals a Bible upside down. That was a violent crackdown on mostly peaceful protestors.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fair points.

        Side note just in case it saves you from a gotcha in arguing with a Maga nutjob, but Trump didn’t hold the Bible upside down that day, per NYT, Politifact, and other fact checkers. He’s still a useless piece of shit.

        • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve watched the video many times. He ultimately gets it right, but clearly fumbles with it upside down as though it was a completely novel object.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Trump refused to send people to crack down on the January 6th insurrectionists.

      Also, pretty hard to say that when one didn’t last a day and resulted in criminal accusations, the other has been going on for over a week and, as far as I know, has seen no one being criminally accused.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        People are being charged with assault, hate speech, trespass and resisting arrest.

        All of which are criminal charges.

  • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If only he was a republican!

    Then OP would forget that he exist! Maybe how he falsified intelligence to lie the country into an unjustified trillion dollar war! …All so they could fuck up the region and we could pretend ignorance as to why the region is somehow magically fucked up…

    Maybe OP can keep posting articles desperately tying every problem to Biden while claiming they are trying to “wake up the dems”.

    You know… by falsely blaming democrats for everything from the weather to your bitter coffee and ignoring the GOP every step, should be fine

      • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which is a shame. I mention the Iraq war and you think MAGA supporter.

        Like marg taylor green ranting about forever wars it’s weird that you see trump supporter in all of this…

        • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          He’s wrong, you come across as a neo lib nazi. Neo libs are almost identical to conservatives so people get confused.

          • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ah neat I advocate for liberal ideals and I get called “neo lib” by folks claiming to be “confused”…

            • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah so you are a neo lib and your “liberal” ideals are pretty much Conservative ideals so people get confused because they are so similar to each other.

              • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The funny part is I can sit back and hear folks like you saying exactly that. It’s other folks being so neo…
                Clearly I’m the enemy…

                Not possible that other people have a misunderstanding …

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Nowhere did I call you a MAGA supporter, I just said you sound like one in that you’re rambling on about conspiracies and witch hunts in response to valid criticism. You’re being a party shill and sycophant just like MAGA supporters.

  • arglebargle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Four colleges simply met with their protestors, came to an agreement to not invest in companies supporting the war, and publicly call for peaceful resolution.

    Why is it so damn hard for all the other ones?

        • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m a bit slow, but your rhetorical question wasn’t clear to me. I appreciated the answer, and your confirmation of what was said.

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Wait… I thought we were supposed to deny any connection between Israel and Judaism to prevent being accused of antisemitism?

        I can’t keep up here.

          • WamGams@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m just saying that until now, there has been a refusal to make any linkage between Israel the nation and Judaism itself.

            I wonder what has changed for some of you, or if nothing has changed and you are just getting more comfortable.

              • 31337@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Meh, evangelical Christians are also very pro-Israel, and give tons of money to pro-Israel groups. Some of the more hawkish strategists are pro-Isreal for military and geopolitical reasons.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s a tough thing. The Israelis and friends are using money and influence to get laws passed in the US and have protests shut down. Which fits really neatly into ancient (literally) anti semite ideas. And it’s really hard to talk about without someone just strawmanning you as a racist.

    • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      came to an agreement to not invest in companies supporting the war

      No, they came to an agreement to listen to a proposal to maybe not invest in those companies.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No it isn’t.

        Presenting independently verifiable facts in a way that bolsters your perspective is not the same as making up stories and using entirely false data to incite your listeners.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Not the ones I’ve spoken to.

            Conservatives won’t usually meet a challenging topic head on, they try to avoid and misdirect from rather than address an issue.

            It boils down to a fundamental difference in perspective and ultimately behavior.

            When conservatives are presented with information, even completely made up stories, that agree with their preconceived notions, they accept the story regardless of the logic or substance of the story. Once information that disagrees with their preconceived notions arises, they reject the story regardless of the logic or substance because it isn’t something they’ve learned before.

            When liberals are presented with information, they accept or reject the story based on the available substantiated information and how it fits into what they have learned so far.

            This is the process behind what fundamentally makes a “conservative” and a “liberal”.

            Conservatives are inherently afraid of challenges to their worldview and as a result, resist change simply for the sake of protecting themselves as long as possible.

            Liberals are also inherently afraid of challenges to their worldview, but persist in discovering the truth and apply what they’ve learned to their behavior because of the benefits that context, understanding and new knowledge might bring about.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Man facing pressure from swarm of angry hornets can see no possible way to soothe the increasingly enraged colony as he continues to hit nest with stick

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      In your words of a tough choice… The moral choice is not tough. The quick “just do it” take is not tough. It’s easy to just throw all in.

      The actual steps that must be made at the level of potus are tough even with the will. The time, the complexity, the repercussions, the fallout… the reality that is a little less clear than “all or nothing” is hard. The ship does not turn on a dime.

      Not disagreeing with you but just saying it’s not a simple choice, but instead a tough direction in a world where the GOP sees presidential powers only apply to republicans and democrats aren’t even citizens.

      • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        How hard is to just not sign a piece of paper that gives tens of billions to Israel? Seems pretty easy to me.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        There are many things that can be done, but biden isn’t doing any of them. There are also things he could simply not do (e.g. supplying weapons), but he goes out of his way to do them. I’d understand if biden was trying to do the right thing, but he’s really not.

        • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I would argue that they are being done but you’re not seeing the effects quite yet.

          I can dig it. While the compromise is unfortunately still ongoing, it’s important to not get caught up in compromise

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      sigh

      Study a little US history and you’ll find we’ve struggled with that question pretty much since the nation’s founding.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Before Pearl Harbor, the US was totally fine with what the Nazis were doing in Europe, even going as far as to disparage Jewish people and refuse to allow them to come from Europe to the US for asylum. Seems things never change and our leaders consistently have no problem being on the wrong side of history.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The fact that the US has made bad choices doesn’t make not supporting genocide a complex question