• zelifcam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No one said it was the only path. I don’t see that being argued anywhere. But since the topic of THIS post is about Disney+ then it seems relevant to the discussion as why people are paying it.

    But sure let’s hear more about your irrelevance on the topic.

    • oo1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I thought Disney was “nearly a requirement” . . . sounds to like those precious few who can manage without might have some useful information.
      Typically this is what happens in a free competitive market, when a price goes up people look for substitutes.
      And if they face constraints in moving to the substitute, they will benefit from help in loosening those constraints.

      • zelifcam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        So what’s the issue? You’re upset because I said that?

        There are a 150 million Disney subscribers right now. Down from 160 a few years ago. The price increase has turned a few away, but not many.

        Clearly there are families that continue to justify the expense. Again, I don’t have the service or children. I just thought it was odd for people to have so much hate for families who spend $12 a month to watch shows.