• oo1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I thought Disney was “nearly a requirement” . . . sounds to like those precious few who can manage without might have some useful information.
    Typically this is what happens in a free competitive market, when a price goes up people look for substitutes.
    And if they face constraints in moving to the substitute, they will benefit from help in loosening those constraints.

    • zelifcam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      So what’s the issue? You’re upset because I said that?

      There are a 150 million Disney subscribers right now. Down from 160 a few years ago. The price increase has turned a few away, but not many.

      Clearly there are families that continue to justify the expense. Again, I don’t have the service or children. I just thought it was odd for people to have so much hate for families who spend $12 a month to watch shows.