No they didn’t. The people who didn’t vote made their choice. They chose to let Trump win because they can’t be bothered to participate in elections. Apathy is a country killer.
A “landslide” (which it wasnt even lmao) propped up by 10-100x the normal percentage of bullet ballots? For the first time ever in the history of our electoral system.
Bullet ballots normally are 0.1-1% of all ballots cast in any given district. In many key districts in swing states they made up 10% of the ballots cast. 10%! That is a statistically impossible increase without some kind of explanation. Like if there had been an entire movement pushing for people to only vote trump and not for the party at large.
But hold on, there was supposed to be a “mandate” given to the republican party. Then why would so many trump voters only vote for trump and nobody else? Because it was bullshit.
It would be relatively simple to manipulate the machines to scan a ballot, then wipe all of the selections, and fill in only one selection for the presidential ballot. The presidential ballot is the only election that is ubiquitous across all districts. They couldnt make something complicated enough to properly fill in every ballot, so they went with the hack and slash version. The end result is 10-100x the normal number of bullet ballots that we would normally see anywhere.
Logical proof? Who the fuck bothers to wait in line to vote and then only votes for President and nothing else? The role that arguably has the least direct impact on anyones daily life, in comparison to local and state government
Or how about the fact that every runoff race so far in places that went to Trump, based heavily on bullet ballots, has consistently resulted in a democratic candidate being elected? Does that not seem odd? Supposedly trump loving country like Iowa voting for democrats? Looks a lot like those expert polls showing Iowa would go blue were 100% on the money. Foul play has never been so mathematically obvious
I’m not an American and I have pretty much zero understading of how your electoral system works, but I what I do understand is that you have electoral college in which electoral bodies voted 312 to 226 which I’d definitely call a landslide, despite much smaller difference is popular votes, where Trump still won anyways.
So yeah, sorry, it IS only fair to call it a landslide, no matter how bitter of a pill it is to swallow.
It was pretty much a landslide victory after all, not much space to second guess these results
I don’t think you know what “landslide” means.
I call 312-226 a landslide, no matter if we condone electoral college or not
deleted by creator
No they didn’t. The people who didn’t vote made their choice. They chose to let Trump win because they can’t be bothered to participate in elections. Apathy is a country killer.
A “landslide” (which it wasnt even lmao) propped up by 10-100x the normal percentage of bullet ballots? For the first time ever in the history of our electoral system.
Bullet ballots normally are 0.1-1% of all ballots cast in any given district. In many key districts in swing states they made up 10% of the ballots cast. 10%! That is a statistically impossible increase without some kind of explanation. Like if there had been an entire movement pushing for people to only vote trump and not for the party at large.
But hold on, there was supposed to be a “mandate” given to the republican party. Then why would so many trump voters only vote for trump and nobody else? Because it was bullshit.
It would be relatively simple to manipulate the machines to scan a ballot, then wipe all of the selections, and fill in only one selection for the presidential ballot. The presidential ballot is the only election that is ubiquitous across all districts. They couldnt make something complicated enough to properly fill in every ballot, so they went with the hack and slash version. The end result is 10-100x the normal number of bullet ballots that we would normally see anywhere.
Logical proof? Who the fuck bothers to wait in line to vote and then only votes for President and nothing else? The role that arguably has the least direct impact on anyones daily life, in comparison to local and state government
Or how about the fact that every runoff race so far in places that went to Trump, based heavily on bullet ballots, has consistently resulted in a democratic candidate being elected? Does that not seem odd? Supposedly trump loving country like Iowa voting for democrats? Looks a lot like those expert polls showing Iowa would go blue were 100% on the money. Foul play has never been so mathematically obvious
I’m not an American and I have pretty much zero understading of how your electoral system works, but I what I do understand is that you have electoral college in which electoral bodies voted 312 to 226 which I’d definitely call a landslide, despite much smaller difference is popular votes, where Trump still won anyways.
So yeah, sorry, it IS only fair to call it a landslide, no matter how bitter of a pill it is to swallow.