fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 27 days agoDiddy could be ousted from courtroom for attempting to influence jurors during trialwww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDiddy could be ousted from courtroom for attempting to influence jurors during trialwww.usatoday.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareBob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·27 days agoNot to defend the guy, but isn’t that the whole point of a trial (to influence the jurors in the courtroom)?
minus-squareBeldarofremulak@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-225 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareLedericas@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·26 days agothey probably meant jury tampering, either by buying them off, or giving them something in return for favorable vote.
minus-squarew3dd1e@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·26 days agoThe article says it was because he was looking at the jurors and nodding. I’m sure what I’m picturing wasn’t what happy because I didn’t understand it either.
minus-squareLedericas@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·26 days agosounds like potential tampering, so they probably going to need new jurors.
minus-squarekreskin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-226 days agoTheres rules, Bob. They arent optional. As a defendent you follow those rules.
Not to defend the guy, but isn’t that the whole point of a trial (to influence the jurors in the courtroom)?
deleted by creator
they probably meant jury tampering, either by buying them off, or giving them something in return for favorable vote.
The article says it was because he was looking at the jurors and nodding. I’m sure what I’m picturing wasn’t what happy because I didn’t understand it either.
sounds like potential tampering, so they probably going to need new jurors.
Theres rules, Bob. They arent optional. As a defendent you follow those rules.