• Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You have the right to assembly, not the right to trespass anywhere you want at any time.

    They could get a permit to protest on public grounds like parks, and would be protected by the law. But that doesn’t grab media attention, so they choose to be civilly unruly in their protests. It grabs attention far better, at greater risk to themselves.

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Were you not alive during the BLM protests? They had plenty of permits and it didn’t stop cops from shooting out their eyes and kicking them out.

      A permit means nothing now since nobody respects it from police to judges. There is no form of legal protest in public anymore. That’s why you’re being downvoted.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not sure on the specifics of the Yale protest, but the Columbia protestors were protesting in the designated “free speech” protest area that campus has. They are students protesting exactly where the school told them to, they just don’t like the anti genocide message.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They are students protesting exactly where the school told them to

        This article claims that the school asked them not to protest on campus because of complaints that there were threats of violence and intimidation targeting Jewish students.

        I’m not here to argue what’s true or not, though. I have no idea.

        The fact of the matter is that the college has the right to ask anyone to leave, and if you refuse, that is trespassing. Obviously, if the police arrested them, they were asked to leave and refused (barring oppressive police practices like surrounding them so they couldn’t leave, which has not been alleged by anyone in this case).