If you havent seen the compilation video here it is: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-xVufYXaGg8

He’s being sued because he used publicly available credentials to login to a fox streaming site and recorded the videos of Ye West saying antisemitic things on the Tucker Carlson interview that was cut from the broadcasted version. https://timburkelegalfund.org/ Has more information

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    He’s being sued because he used publicly available credentials to login to a fox streaming site and recorded the videos

    I fully support the guy’s work, but also it sounds like the “publicly available credentials” were stolen login info? You can’t use stolen or leaked login info to log in to a system you’re not authorized to use, take data from that system, and then expect no consequences. This is blatantly illegal

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep. It’s like if a guy wanted to make a video about shrinkflation so he went and shoplifted a bunch of shit.

      • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here that that sort of thing is frowned upon…

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s in the public interest that journalists have special protection for illegally obtained information.

      Imagine if Julian Assange was persecuted for whistleblowing on all the illegal shit the gov’t was doing. Oh wait.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Possessing illegally obtained information is completely different from illegally obtaining information though. Publishing documents given to you by an insider or a whistleblower is not the same thing as breaking in to a system and taking documents