• BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is very disingenuous. It wasn’t cancelled “to deny uncommitted challenge”

    It was cancelled to save money.

    They have always done this. They cancelled Obama’s and Clinton’s re-election primaries as well.

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This seems incredibly short sighted. People don’t like having their voice silenced, for good reason. Refuse them a chance now and they’re more likely to make their displeasure known in the general election when it will have a much greater effect.

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I find it hilarious as the “vote uncommitted” movement(?) specifically says that they will vote for whoever is on the Dem ticket in the General Election. This is just a complete self own by the Democratic Party.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        When party members show a lack of support it suggests that the independent voters are also likely to be questioning their support. It is atill a message that might influence his campaign if it was anything other than Israel.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It only matters in how it makes their vibes feel; which is why they’re doing this. This is the same kind of spite that they ratfucked Sanders with-- not that Sanders would’ve been any net positive.