• TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, I’m sure we could get a non-profit started that offers the exact same service. Just get drivers to take on the responsibility of covering any accidents, etc. It could run on donations like Wikipedia. The drivers get 100% of the profits…I’m sure there’s be unforeseen snags, but I really wish we could start “disrupting” industries by literally taking these tech fucks’ share of the market and redistribute that shit to drivers.

    Rides would probably be cheaper, no surge pricing, and a good ol’ stick in the eye of the tech industry.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The insurance is part of why it works. I looked up commercial insurance rates for a taxi and it’s like $2,000 every six months. And while that’s doable if rates are the same or only a little lower it’s still one hell of a gut check. Because you don’t know if you’re going to get customers. Uber and Lyft absorbed that risk.

      So what’s likely to happen in the near future is uninsured or under insured open source ride-sharing that will need to crown a winning app or two before it gets predictable enough for people to pay that.

      And that means it also needs to survive that stage with Uber and Lyft strongly messaging normal people about safety and quality concerns.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Holy shit, why not just read the article? This is exactly what the interview is about.

      Why do people read the comments, but not the articles? I don’t get it.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      fuck it, even add in real ride shares, where you say ‘I’m going to x place, I’m willing to go y amount out of my way and pick up z passengers’