• Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can read the post here: https://feddit.org/post/12529640

      There is nothing there containing a one state solution and also german law totally doesn’t prohibit calling for it.

      And BTW: You have a autocorrect error in your post: “leave” vs “live” can lead to people misunderstanding your point.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I believe that’s what some people who don’t like the instance claim. I’m pretty sure I read that, too. But I really can’t find it in the rules written by themselves. You can not however say the state of Israel needs to be dissolved in the process, I think that’s banned. I’m not a mod there but I’d say as you prased it, it should be fine.

      • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Israel made it impossible for a two state solution to happen with all the illegal settlements. What’s wrong with dissolving Israel and create a one state solution where both can has the same rights?

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          This discussion is about some peculiarities in German law concerning hate speech. And about how it might be considered hate speech if someone were to call for the termination of the country. It’s complicated though and you need to read the law and not take my summary. This has nothing to do with whether one or two states or other ideas might be better or worse.