• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I believe that’s what some people who don’t like the instance claim. I’m pretty sure I read that, too. But I really can’t find it in the rules written by themselves. You can not however say the state of Israel needs to be dissolved in the process, I think that’s banned. I’m not a mod there but I’d say as you prased it, it should be fine.

    • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Israel made it impossible for a two state solution to happen with all the illegal settlements. What’s wrong with dissolving Israel and create a one state solution where both can has the same rights?

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        This discussion is about some peculiarities in German law concerning hate speech. And about how it might be considered hate speech if someone were to call for the termination of the country. It’s complicated though and you need to read the law and not take my summary. This has nothing to do with whether one or two states or other ideas might be better or worse.