• witten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t think the goal is to convince the people stuck in the artificially created traffic about Gaza. I think it’s to get news coverage from sites like nbcnews.com so as to raise the profile of the Gaza war so that politicians must address it. You are welcome to argue whether that’s an effective strategy, but I think that’s the intent.

    Also, side note… Social progress rarely comes from rule following.

    • guacupado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think it’s to get news coverage from sites like nbcnews.com so as to raise the profile of the Gaza war so that politicians must address it.

      Right… because the global leaders of the world aren’t already aware of what’s going on. Thanks for raising awareness, guys.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s about the public discourse. If an issue (e.g. the U.S. giving Israel weapons and enabling their war) disappears from the headlines, it’s much easier for politicians to ignore it. But if the issue keeps coming up, politicians feel pressure to act–or they risk getting voted out of office. Especially during an election year.

    • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is the profile not high enough? I’m pretty sure everyone knows about it who needs to know about it. Blocking traffic isn’t going to make a ceasefire happen across the world. Annoying your fellow citizens and ruining their day isn’t getting any politicians to act. It’s pointless. Actions must be taken against those in charge if we want to see any forward progress. Blocking traffic to protest a war is like yelling at a frycook because you want the McRib back. The actions are being aimed at the wrong people.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        counterpoint: the people who would enact this change are far beyond our reach as citizens so there is no way to target them with effective protests.

        Besides, some of the best way to affect policy is to A. Cost large businesses money or B. To cause general unrest over an issue. Both of these things will piss your fellow American off but this is how protests work nowadays.

        I think most protestors don’t want to block cars of normal people or throw paint onto paintings or whatever. But they have to because if you look at the laws, organized protest has no bite anymore. Go ahead, annoy the politicians, they’ll just arrest your outside of their house and no one will hear about your issue.

        • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s the problem. No one is actually doing anything worthwhile. You are right, standing outside the mayors house will get you arrested. Do it anyway. Get arrested. You want to make big moves for your cause, do something worth being arrested over. Imagine if all of those people on the bridge yesterday had been blocking traffic to the mayors neighborhood instead. What are they gonna do, arrest a thousand people in a suburb street? That’s a fucking news story. Blocking a bridge is bullshit, it carries no weight because there is nothing on the line. Congrats, you fucked up a half million people’s day, I guess someone should call the genocide off, now.

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            What do you mean it carries no weight? That was my entire point. Make the public mad, the angry public starts yelling at the mayor. The business owners whose workers can’t get to the office start getting rather upset. Whereas if a minority inconvenience a politician, cool, but they don’t care. They will just find ways to avoid it. And in this case, you don’t have access to politicians that hold weight in regard to Gaza.

            Go ahead, egg your senators house, they don’t live there most of the time. Threaten to vote them out, they run unopposed. The ways in which to express political efforts is now so narrow that stuff like blocking a bridge has become almost inevitable.

            • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I do not think we live in the same world, where someone being late to their job will make the business owner consider political change.

        • guacupado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          counterpoint: the people who would enact this change are far beyond our reach as citizens so there is no way to target them with effective protests

          Literally go to the capitols instead. Or go to their houses. Some place that actually effects them rather than complete laymen.

          • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Seriously! Protesting has never accomplished anything ever and is totally useless unless it’s done explicitly for politicians that are totally receptive and eager to assist their constituents!

          • thejynxed@lemmy.basedcount.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            They won’t do that because they can and will get an armed response from three-letter agencies and LEOs. It’s the same reason these absolute clowns never protest where the weapons are made and shipped from, they’ll get beaten and shot, and they know it, so instead they harass everyone else.