• neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m visiting my parents in my home country after many years of not being there. I’m hoping my dad’s old pentium 2 laptop is still around.

  • Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Mail sorter for a company I worked for uses Windows 3.1.

    My parents ancient HP from 1997, I sold the motherboard with popped capacitors for $250. I informed the buyer of the condition and he said he didn’t care, he’d fix it, but they needed it for some legacy hardware their company functioned on.

    • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      😂 🤣

      Similarly, my Dad ran his medical office on Win98 until he died (2011).

      Of course, he had no support for OS or the medical office software other than himself (and me).

      Had a supplier of inexpensive old machines/parts.

      All cause he refused to pay the $5k required to upgrade the medical office software that ran on those machines. 🤷‍♂️

      • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        My dad’s company still runs software from 2002 for recording sales and sending bills. Runs fine on Windows 10 surprisingly

  • Fox@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    At my old workplace, there was numerous XP machines still going. They were running old machine equipment, and basically served as a controller for the entire machine.

    As it turns out, it was cheaper to keep these XP stations, instead of buying a completely new Hydrolic press, or whatever it was running, which cost several hundred of thousands of dollars.

    One day one of these computers stopped working, and we immediately tried to get the software to work on a brand new W10 replacement. Took us a week of drivers hell, until we eventually went to the basement, found an exact replica, and swapped the HDD over.

    The company, making these heavy machineries, went bankrupt in the early 2000s, and there was literally no way of getting the software to run on anything besides that original box.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Yup. Take backups, have spares, and keep it off the Internet and it’ll work just fine.

      Pro tip, you can get IDE to CF adapters if you want to put an SSD in those old machines to really see them fly. Just be aware that they don’t have nearly as good write durability as a real SSD, so keep write heavy operations on the HDD.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        You can get industrial grade CF cards that use SLC memory. They have much better write endurance than normal CF cards.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah, and as long as these things never touch the internet, there really isn’t an issue.

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      There’s still things like that on my workplace today. I think there’s some older, rarely used CNC with Win98 on the controller. We just keep spares around when they break, but that’s cheaper than replacing the whole machinery. Also there’s some XP stations running software for an industrial machine which would cost quarter of a million to replace. Some of those need access to network drives and such but they live in a strictly isolated VLAN.

      And, as far as I’ve told at least, there was no option at any point to upgrade just the computers on those things. It’s always the whole assembly line or whatever they’re connected to. There’s not many companies willing to throw hundreds of thousands every 3-5 years to replace perfectly working equipment.

      • Fox@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s funny, because this scenario actually happened in our CNC hall.

        The guys over there were working with SolidWorks and Mastercam. I never really got too involved with their work, other than installing the software remotely for them.

        It could very well have been a CNC machine that this procedure was about. I just know that they had all kinds of equipment in there, along with a hydrolic press, which peaked my interest the most because of a certain Finnish youtuber haha.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        there’s some older, rarely used CNC

        Me over here with a dirty mind 100% positive that I’m not using “CNC” the same way you are. I don’t know what your way means, but my way is more fun.

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          CNC—computer numerical control, where a computer makes the cutty/smushy/printy parts move through meatspace.

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          CNC—computer numerical control, where a computer makes the cutty/smushy/printy parts move through meatspace.

    • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      There are third parties that create new software for old industrial machines for this exact reason.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I set up a 32 bit Windows 7 VM so my dad could keep using his old drawing program that was built for Windows 3.11.

      It was the last version of Windows to support 3.11 compabillity.

      Works well.

      • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Just a note: Windows software for controlling hardware is highly likely to assume a)direct access to the hardware (sometimes mediated thorough ancient APIs and assuming the existence of defunct expansion slots) and b) assume meatspace time can be counted using OS timing ticks (which get stretched out as modern VMs timeshare with other processes underneath the virtulized hardware). It is awfully tough to replace them sometimes.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Yeah, I suspect you gotta do something similar to what McLaren did when the special mid 90s computer they used for the F1 got too hard to replace as they broke, they built a new computer interface that was compatible with modern computers and allowed them to interface with the car

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’d like a law that software / hardware companies who file for bankruptcies must release the source / files for their tech to an open source repository.

      • guy_threepwood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        If you are a big company there are often ESCROW agreements for things like this. I have encountered the “data dumps” from time to time and whilst it’s “better” it’s not ideal. Half finished documentarian, virtual machines of mis-configured OS installs… it’s almost as if it was just a straight copy of the development environment as it was just as they made the final version of the software…

        But it’s better than nothing.

        Main issue I can see with this forcing open source would be libraries and frameworks licensed from others who would likely still be in business and wouldn’t agree to those parts becoming open sourced. See also WinAMP https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/16/opensourcing_of_winamp_goes_badly/

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        That idea often comes up in these discussions and I’ve never really had an argument against. Best I got is that parts of that software may have moved to more modern stuff that was purchased by another company. But that’s a damned thin excuse not to implement this.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I like that idea bit it’ll never fly. That software is an asset. A bankrupt company needs every asset to be sold to cover as much percentage of their debt to their vendors as possible. I’ve been in a company that went bankrupt and I’ve been the vendor of a company that went bankrupt. Being the vendor was the harder experience.

        • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          I’m sure it makes the bean counters happier to have another asset valued at X amount, but in practice the software will just be locked in some vault where it won’t do anyone any good.

          Its an instance where the number on the screen doesn’t actually correspond to any useful economic activity.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    People keep saying to keep these XP machines off the internet. I seriously doubt there’s much threat, especially for even older OS’s like 98 and 95. It’s the very devil just trying to browse with them, nothing much out there is going to be able to attack them. Security through obscurity indeed!

    In any case, we’re no longer in the Wild West days when people had machines hooked directly to the internet and a firewall was a third-party addon. LOL, ZoneAlarm anyone!

    We all have a basic firewall built into our routers so unless you deliberately expose services you’re fairly bulletproof to scanners. I remember scanning for Win2000 machines in blocks of IPs, long after it was defunct. Plenty were out there!

    • Blemgo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      You are forgetting targeted attacks. A blind attack would pretty much not have much of an effect indeed, however if the attacker knows the machine, then it’s easy for the attackers to exploit these vulnerability if left “out in the open”, and cause havoc, possibly create a lot of damages or leech informations pumped into those machines via old Windows installations.

      • Doom@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        For a business sure.

        You wanna hack my dnd campaign and some pictures of my cock? Sure whatever dude. All financial and important shit goes through my phone anyway and that’s likely to be hacked from the institutions I use.

          • Doom@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            While that is awful and sucks. Again, probably won’t really target me

            If China or America use my machine as a member of their DDoS bot swarm likely I probably couldn’t even fight back as much as I’d like. Either one of those countries could have backdoor bullshit into any system you think of.

            If it is a nefarious third party maybe I want them to use my computer to attack the financial system of these capitalist regimes or to harm the infrastructure of an oppressive government.

            Again, have my cock and dnd campaign. If my system runs slow and annoys me guess I’ll deal with it. They already will get my information from the millions of sources compiling and collecting it.

            I dunno doesn’t really make me shake in my boots

            • TheBeege@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              This is short-sighted. It also reeks of “Fuck you, I got mine!” I know that’s not your intention. I just think you haven’t thought super hard about it. I was the same with privacy concerns.

              So let me throw some edge cases at you.

              You remember the network time protocol vulnerability that was used to power botnets for a little bit? Well, until everyone upgraded their shit, service providers had to just block IP ranges of compromised machines until enough machines in that block stopped DDoS’ing them.

              So what happens when some script kiddy pays for time on the botnet, which includes your box, to smash Wizards while you’re trying to look things up? Or what if someone uses your box as a jump box to go attack some giant corporation, and shit gets traced back to you? Or what if someone decides you’re the unlucky one where their whole goal is to dominate your entire home network, and they get your phone when it’s on your home wifi?

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Some might be surprised how many systems are still running on AS400s. IBM still makes and maintains IBMi, the modern iteration. My last company wrote our flagship product for these machines, all green screen. Our customers would sometimes move to our GUI product and jump right back to the prompt menus. Hey, if you gotta move fast and have a bulletproof system, text menus are the only way to fly!

    By my god, the skill set for running and programming those beasts touches on almost nothing I’ve learned in 30+ years of IT work. Wish I had got experience in that part of the company, seen some solid job posts for that sorta tech.

    • tjsauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I worked with an AS400 while in vehicle logistics, those things are optimized for simple functions but high data throughput

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I worked in the airline industry for years and learned a GUI overlay for one system and another entirely green screen system called SHARES (see if you can guess the airline). Honestly I kind of enjoyed working with those systems; there’s some refreshing “back to basics” feeling kind of like driving a manual transmission.

      In my current job I’ve been using another legacy system. Well, my job was to create a relatively modern service for the legacy system to call, but none of the remaining developers knew how to use the extensions of that system that does SOAP calls. So I had to learn just enough of that legacy system to hold their hands through the parts that call my service. Kind of fun, to be honest!

  • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Ancient industrial machines use ancient windows computers. This has been known forever. There’s a whole niche industry of very expensive ram and hard drives and other components keeping this machines going

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah man. Details are going to be fuzzy here, but I think it was only in recent memory where Boeing upgraded the planes in Japan to no longer need floppy disks.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    MS DOS 6.6 for me - I enjoy the power of a 286 processor and much smaller instruction sets.

    :O

  • LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Nuclear silos… is that early dos system I believe?

    As long as things are not connected and not trying to add newer stuff , what’s the problem?

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I had a 486DX running DOS for writing and editing CAM programs for CNC mills, lathes, pipe bender, and a laser cutter. And for funsies, an even older Macintosh that booted from a 5 1/4" floppy that ran a CMM, (co-ordinate measuring machine). And the software for the CMM ran from another 5 1/4" floppy.

    This was about 2017 before I retired as a toolmaker.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Stuck or preferred choice?

    Trapped using software they needed to buy once, vs rent?

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m a bit depressed that I finally need to upgrade my last windows 7 machine. It looks like it’s 10 for me now :-(

    • Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Yes, stuck. There are enourmous problems with different institutions having to use ancient PCs because the software doesn’t work on modern ones, be they electron microscopes, hospitals or industrial machinery, causing e.g. enourmous security issues. This is one of the most important reasons why FOSS and why making FOSS software mandatory in government contracts is so important.

      Also how come people can’t read the fucking article before commenting?

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    “stuck” more like happy to not have to deal with the last 15-ish years of microsoft ruining everything they previously excelled at.

    • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      They lost me when they removed the start button on the left side of the taskbar in version 8.1 (I think it was) to… Be cool with the kids (I think 8.1 was supposed to be touch screen friendly)? I don’t even know, but I went back to Windows 7 for a long while.

      The backlash with the start button was so huge that they put it back on the taskbar in Windows 10 (at least mine has it and is the reason I got Windows 10). I’m currently refusing to update to Windows 11, because it apparently crashes when playing certain video games and I’m not about to have the other trash bugs that come with it, which I’ve been seeing posted on Microsoft help forums when I search for Windows 10 related questions. Fuck that noise, I don’t want to deal with it.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Windows 8 removed the start button, 8.1 brought back most all of the “legacy” UI features (which still persist today).

        • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          It might be. I remember buying a laptop at that time and it came with 8 and it annoyed me so dang much.

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        They seemingly wanted to design the entire interface around touchscreen 2-in-1s. If you went in a Microsoft store around the time windows 8 came out, they were leaning really hard into the 2-in-1s. I got a surface pro 3 at that time that I used to take handwritten notes in school, and the windows 8 interface was honestly awesome with that use case. On my desktop PC, though, I held out updating from 7 until windows 10.