• SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not like these billionaires are spending this money, so it’s just been invested for 7 years. What’s the old adage, Rule of 72? Given a 10% rate of return, they would be expected to double their money in…

    …seven years.

    While the tax policies certainly aren’t helping the majority of the population, let’s not pretend compound interest isn’t a thing.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not as if that makes it any better. Tax policy should be designed to actively combat the inequality increase created by compound interest, not go along with it.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wealth is not cash or cash equivalents though. They aren’t investing all of their wealth

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most of the wealth of billionaires is invested, often in the same vehicles used by everyone else (stocks, real estate, etc).

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      But, due to their investments they do invest it in large quantities, often spread over a large stock portfolio.

      And if we had a fraction of a penny financial transaction tax, we’d get a ridiculous amount of money from the investor class and almost no one else would be affected.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That would mean less revenue, but stock traders would still make many transactions per day like they did before HFT, so it would still bring in a massive amount of revenue.