• thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Y’all are being way too harsh. I’m sure he has a really good reason for why he enabled and protected Harvey Weinstein’s rapery. Something so convincing that we’d all say, “you were absolutely right to help blow up the lives of fellow artists. You’re really not a piece of shit!”

        • entwine413@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There’s never a good reason to enable and protect rape.

          I just realized that you’re probably being sarcastic, though.

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            I really thought that my sarcasm was obvious, especially with that last sentence… Apparently there are people out there who are more openly shitty than I realized.

            There’s never a good reason to enable and protect rape.

            Any standard set lower than this should be grounds to get throat-punched.

            • entwine413@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, there are absolutely people who honestly believe that exposing Weinstein was a bad thing. Humans suck.