I think you just missed the beginning of the conversation and tried to jump into it.
We started by saying that these should have a flared end, and I said that without a flared end, it’s going to require medical intervention. That’s where you jumped in to say, rather condescendingly, that’s what the flared end is for. Go back and re-read the thread, because I really just think you’re missing the context of the conversation we’re having.
Maybe not in your neck of the woods… 😉
… there’s a picture of them. The picture is the same regardless of our respective necks or woods.
Thank you, Professor Pedantic.
I think you just missed the beginning of the conversation and tried to jump into it.
We started by saying that these should have a flared end, and I said that without a flared end, it’s going to require medical intervention. That’s where you jumped in to say, rather condescendingly, that’s what the flared end is for. Go back and re-read the thread, because I really just think you’re missing the context of the conversation we’re having.
Oh, sweet summer child…
No one is being a cunt or pedantic, you’re just saying something that’s wrong and unfunny
your woods need thick necks to prevent oopsies
OK…