It’s a significant reversal from recent history: President Joe Biden is struggling with young voters but performing better than most Democrats with older ones.

  • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    every president is a dictator day one, rolling back previous administration policy and implementing their own.

    That’s not what a dictatorship is. A dictatorship is where one person (the dictator) has almost complete control over the government with few, if any, restrictions. Executive orders can only be within the President’s authority, and can also be overturned by Congress or the Supreme Court. To link executive orders to a dictatorship shows a misunderstanding of executive orders, dictatorships, or both.

    Also, in the quote of being a “dictator for just one day,” executive orders were not mentioned, if I remember correctly. And no democratic President should ever think of themselves as a dictator or wish they were one.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s not what a dictatorship is. A dictatorship is where one person (the dictator) has almost complete control over the government with few, if any, restrictions.

      they are literally creating policy by dictate. your pet definition seems crafted to exclude this obvious use of dictate.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        they are literally creating policy by dictate. your pet definition seems crafted to exclude this obvious use of dictate.

        Someone who “dictates” is not necessarily a dictator. These are not my “pet definitions” but accepted definitions of what a dictator/dictatorship is in the political sphere. It’s called context.

        No one in the government should say “I’m going to dictate policy that I have control over, but this policy can be overturned by the other two branches. Thus, I’m a dictator.” That’s not what that word means. You are trying to use a nonspecific definition out of context to justify defending a wannabe dictator.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          These are not my “pet definitions” but accepted definitions of what a dictator/dictatorship is in the political sphere. It’s called context.

          can you substantiate this claim, that governing by dictate is not an accepted definition"in the political sphere". while we’re on it, what do you define as “the political sphere”?

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          No one in the government should say “I’m going to dictate policy that I have control over, but this policy can be overturned by the other two branches. Thus, I’m a dictator.” That’s not what that word means. You are trying to use a nonspecific definition out of context to justify defending a wannabe dictator.

          i’m not defending a wannabe dictator. i’m explicitly saying i think trump’s stupid, and i don’t believe he meant “dictator” in the same sense that you insist he must have meant it.

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To link executive orders to a dictatorship shows a misunderstanding of executive orders, dictatorships, or both.

      Also, in the quote of being a “dictator for just one day,” executive orders were not mentioned

      no one is accusing trump of being a knowledgeable statesman.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        no one is accusing trump of being a knowledgeable statesman.

        That was actually you who linked them, not him. And they shouldn’t be linked. Executive orders are not a dictatorship. But let’s say he meant, even though he’s famous for saying what he means with no filter.

        Even after campaigning for it, holding the office for 4 years, presumably keeping an eye on his successor for 4 years, and now campaigning for it again? You’d think he’d know the basics of what is a democracy, what is a dictatorship, what executive orders do, and what do the different branches of government roughly do…you know, the basics that were taught in middle school, and elaborated on in high school. These aren’t niche laws or obscure cases we’re talking about, but what should be common sense to the common man…much more so for someone who’s running for the job. Willful ignorance is not an excuse, especially at that level…if that’s what this is.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          i think he’s a dummy, and he may be operating on my folksy definition of “dictator”. my assumption is just as valid as yours.

          so it’s dumb to say it that way, but i don’t believe he ever said he’s planning to “end democracy” or even meant to imply that.