A shooting at a bar in a popular outdoor mall in a Miami suburb early Saturday left two dead and seven injured.

According to local law enforcement, an altercation at a martini bar at the CityPlace Doral complex broke out around 3:30 a.m. Saturday, prompting a security guard working the scene to intervene. A man involved in the altercation subsequently produced a gun and shot and killed the guard.

“You start hearing shots. And it wasn’t one. It was one after another, after another, after another,” recalled Peter Andres Jordan, who was in the bar at the time.

Two police officers then shot and killed the alleged gunman, but not before one officer and six bystanders — five men and a woman, according to police — were wounded in the shootout.

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yep, it’s 60% less than 100% of 450+ million and every single one of them removed from circulation makes people safer.

    Lol no it doesn’t. Less firearms doesn’t magically make anyone safer. Making sure people don’t turn to crime to survive does, making sure there is mental health and single payer healthcare so people who need the help can get it without fear does. Making sure our children are properly educated and aren’t crammed into classrooms where kids cannot get proper education does… But you keep thinking that taking away firearms will magically fix all of our underlying issues. You sound like someone who puts a new roof on a house while the rest of it underneath is being eaten by rot and termites.

    That’s the idiots view of how gun control works and you couldn’t make it any clearer that your understanding of gun control comes straight from the gun lobby.

    Lol I don’t follow the gun lobby. You’re arguing with a left leaning person, who wants to make sure our society has a good foundation. You on the other hand sound like some white privilege suburb kid who is terrified of anyone that’s not like you.

    You can’t even keep your idiocy straight in your own comment. Did Australia send police to “go forcefully into everyone’s homes to confiscate them”?

    https://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/citation/quotes/2572

    Yeah they did, they have collected a shit ton of guns since the 1996 confiscation, but it really didn’t do anything because there are more firearms in the hands of civilians there than there were in 96.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Less firearms doesn’t magically make anyone safer.

      Even disregarding all the studies and statistics proving you wrong, the abject failure of pro-gun policy for over 20 years has made it clear that more guns don’t make anyone safer.

      The property crime rate is identical to every other wealthy country, only with a layer of murder on top. The police execute more people in the street without cause or punishment. The upcoming election is between a neoliberal and a barely coherent reality TV star who openly simps for fascists.

      So what exactly are we tolerating all this violence for? Your sad little hero fantasies?

      Making sure people don’t turn to crime to survive blah blah blah

      Nothing more than your latest bullshit excuse. You told us it was Marilyn Manson and video games. Then you told us it was because schools had too many doors and not enough God. Now you’re blaming social issues (all of which pro-gun politicians oppose fixing) because you know it’s an excuse that will be good for 50 years.

      So fuck off and build it. While you do, we can address the gun problem that by your own admission escalates these problems into murder and terrorism.

      Making sure our children are properly educated and aren’t crammed into classrooms where kids cannot get proper education does

      Don’t worry, there isn’t a child in America who hasn’t been “properly educated” about what happens when a parade of red flags becomes a “responsible gun owner”. They’ve gone to school every day wondering if their school will be next and watched as the pro-gun community spat on them for speaking out. One day, they’ll be the ones writing laws and they’re going to remember exactly how much compassion you showed them.

      But you keep thinking that taking away firearms will magically fix all of our underlying issues

      You mean the issues that progressives have been fighting to address since long before gun owners decided to use them as their latest scapegoat? Don’t worry, we can do more than one thing at a time but unfortunately for you, we’re not obliged to follow your bullshit “fix every other problem first” demands.

      You sound like someone who puts a new roof on a house while the rest of it underneath is being eaten by rot and termites.

      I actually love this analogy because you’re too fucking stupid to realise that the rot could absolutely be a problem with a failing roof that needs replacing. But there you are in your rotting house, gormlessly insisting your roof is infallible and perfect.

      Lol I don’t follow the gun lobby.

      You absolutely do. That’s why your opinions and talking points are perfectly aligned with what’s most profitable to them. All you’re doing is admitting that you fell for their propaganda without a single critical thought.

      You’re arguing with a left leaning person, who wants to make sure our society has a good foundation.

      I don’t care who you are. It’s anonymous social media. You could claim to be anyone or anything. You’re awkwardly repeating the same rhetoric as pro-gun reactionaries so I’m going to treat you like a pro-gun reactionary.

      You on the other hand sound like some white privilege suburb kid who is terrified of anyone that’s not like you.

      Watching you try the “use their values against them” technique for a second time actually makes you sound more far-right. It’s a strategy openly advocated by neo-nazi groups and you’re really shoehorning trying to shoehorn it in.

      Yeah they did, they have collected a shit ton of guns since the 1996 confiscation

      Yeah good link fuckstick, it says absolutely nothing. Are you genuinely just relying on the fact the word “seized” appears on the page? Police sieze illegal firearms when they’re discovered. They didn’t go door to door tearing poor, innocent semiautomatic weapons from the bosom of their loving owners. Who fills your head with this dogshit?

      do anything because there are more firearms in the hands of civilians there than there were in 96.

      Oh look, more “gun control according to pro-gun groups”. You know it is too, because you’re getting slimy with your wording again. Are those “more firearms” illegal weapons? Are they in the hands of criminals?

      Nope. Counter to all your greasy propaganda, Australia didn’t “ban guns” – those “more weapons” are legal, lower-risk weapons, in the hands of people with firearms licenses, who have been members in good standing at a range or club for more than 6 months, have been psychologically assessed, have demonstrated they can safely operate a firearm and must keep their weapons in a gun safe that no unlicensed person can access.

      And what a shocking plot twist, no mass shootings ans assaults and property crimes never involve guns. They didn’t even have to solve every single social problem that gun owners could think of first.