Ok, let me engage you on this. If it’s a good deed performed with blood money, or with money earned on the backs of a genocide, or with money earned by ripping thousands of families off over and over for a long time, is it a good deed?
In that question, you’ve proven my point. The deed is good even if the funds are not. The ends do not justify the means, but the means do not nullify the ends.
I know what you’re saying - no deed performed by a billionaire can be seen as good, because it was performed by a billionaire. But you’re wrong.
Ok, let me engage you on this. If it’s a good deed performed with blood money, or with money earned on the backs of a genocide, or with money earned by ripping thousands of families off over and over for a long time, is it a good deed?
So theres no need for me to donate my blood money as that would be a bad deed right? Good for me.
In that question, you’ve proven my point. The deed is good even if the funds are not. The ends do not justify the means, but the means do not nullify the ends.
Agree to disagree, old man.
👍