The “Harry Potter” author slammed a newly enacted hate-crime law in Scotland in a series of posts on X  in which she referred to transgender women as men.

J.K. Rowling shared a social media thread on Monday, the day a new Scottish hate-crime law took effect, that misgendered several transgender women and appeared to imply trans women have a penchant for sexual predation. On Tuesday, Scottish police announced they would not be investigating the “Harry Potter” author’s remarks as a crime, as some of Rowling’s critics had called for.

“We have received complaints in relation to the social media post,” a spokesperson for Police Scotland said in a statement. “The comments are not assessed to be criminal and no further action will be taken.”

Scotland’s new Hate Crime and Public Order Act criminalizes “stirring up hatred” against people based on their race, religion, disability, sexuality or gender identity.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am German. We have restrictions on free speech in place, primarily around Nazism and Israel.

      Our government is literally curbing anything critical of israel with those restrictions at this very moment.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think that’s the lesson here. More that even the most well intentioned restrictions can and will be abused by the government once they have that power. If our far right gets into the government I cant imagine what kind of dystopian crap they will try to do with it.

          I am similarly very sceptical of the constant debate for more surveillance and online control in the name of ”protecting the children”. Another very worthy, and very emotionally charged cause where most people will instinctively agree before even thinking about the consequences.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Again- that did not happen when Bolsonaro took power in Brazil.

            So maybe the problem is your laws, not hate speech laws in general.

            You’re acting like Germany is the only country in the world that has these laws.

            • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              And you are acting as if because there is one struggling democracy somewhere on the world who has yet to abuse it, all other incidents and examples throughout history for the inevitable abuse of such power are not valid.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                You’ve given me one single example of abuse. The one in your country.

                Again, that sounds like a problem with your country’s laws in specific.

                • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Do you really want me to list the dozens of instances throughout history where the right to restrict people’s expression has inadvertently caused or helped authoritarians consolidate power? I would think you largely know about those already.

                  A quite recent example is ironically related to the same topic, namely conservatives and religious zealots wanting to police speech the other way by banning inclusionary language. The other side of the exact same coin. I’m sure you are familiar with that issue since it most prominently happens in america, though plenty of European right wingers are looking to do similar things.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I want you to list the dozens of instances throughout history where, specifically, hate speech laws have done so.

                    And if your example is one where Rowling was not arrested, it’s not a very good one.